{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

tv commercial

A new company wants to bring a not-so-innovative format to online advertising:a "deliberately interruptive" :30 ad spot -- just like the ones you get on your TV.

ShortTail Media plans to beta test its Digital 30 (D30) ad this summer, a full-screen interstitial that will run :30 and :15 second spots.

Mediaweek reports David Payne, former head of CNN.com, founded ShortTail and has been busy meeting with top-tier publishers to convince them to sign on for tests. Reuters has reportedly committed,  while MSNBC.com and Weather.com are giving the proposal some serious thought.

ShortTail has reportedly promised frequency capping and limited inventory will be part of the package.

It'll be interesting to see if this flies, on several levels. Consumer acceptance is a biggie, of course. Thirty seconds is a long time to wait, post-click. Moreover, it's it's video, audio is part and parcel of the message. Given ShortTail is going after largely print publishers -- and presumably, the internet primetime, at-work audience, audio may not be what viewers ultimately get along with their video.

Then, there's the production side of the equation. It's common wisdom that simply repurposing TV ads for the Web is simple in concept, but translating images from a small to an even smaller screen is easier said than done. Are advertisers going to bite, and are they going to be willing to pay the extra production costs?

Time - and testing - will tell. Meanwhile, beware of formats dubbed "innovative" that are very obviously the same old, same old.

Rebecca Lieb

Published 11 May, 2009 by Rebecca Lieb

Rebecca Lieb oversees Econsultancy's North American operations.

Follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.

160 more posts from this author

Comments (4)

Avatar-blank-50x50

James

..and at that time, I will stop visiting all sites showing these ads. The web should be navigable without that type of intrusion. It's the last bloody straw, etc...

about 7 years ago

Peter Bordes

Peter Bordes, CEO & Founder at oneQube

i dont think it will work. users behavior in online video is just not the same as traditional media. in fact its going further in the the opposite direction. the video ad and content need to be seen as one. ads are evolving to being more content then ads.

about 7 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Claire

I disagree with using adverts to interupt web usage. I vote for no adverts! I personally use the web most hours of the day due to my job (Web Design). I do not wish to be interupted during research for my inspiration. Adverts are everywhere as it is! How dare they. Who is with me? I may start an online petition.

about 7 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Gregor

I'm not against adverts and I understand that people have to make money, but I think you have to be very careful about how you do it.  If you wind up your visitors then there are plenty of other places to go instead.

People are now used to getting access to videos without having to wait and they don't have the patience required.  I think you'd be shooting yourself in the foot if you implemented a system whereby they had to wait 30 second for their content to start or resume.

about 7 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.