{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Social news site Digg is introducing a new “social advertising platform” this week that will allow users to vote advertisements up and down the way that Digg users currently curate news content. The approach may not be new – companies like Facebook and RazorFish have created similar ads — but the Digg community offers a lot of potential for the strategy.

For starters, Digg users are already in the business of rating content.

Digg is a social news site where users curate content by voting and commenting on submitted links and stories. The new ads will be marked as sponsored content, but will otherwise have the same "look and feel" as the news stories, according to Mike Maser, Digg's chief strategy officer.

Popular ads will be cheaper for advertisers, which should encourage companies to improve their content. But users can also "bury" ads they don't like, and the lower the rating of an ad, the more the advertiser will be charged, which will eventually price poorly targeted ads out of the system.

Digg CEO Jay Adelson says: “Like everything else about Digg, we want to bring users into the conversation and let the advertising be content in ways that will allow for a much richer experience and will really amplify the effectiveness of ads for media buyers.”

The main flaw in the theory of approval ads is the assumption that users are actually looking at advertising in the first place. On social networks like Facebook, users may be very engaged with the content, but they skip over advertising completely. 

The strength that Digg brings to the game is the way that Digg users are already heavlly engaged with voting on content they see on the site. In addition, voting on ads will have an immediate effect on their value and relevance, while a site like Facebook will only “take this feedback into account" with its future strategy.

"The notion of ads on Facebook has been fraught with problems from the beginning," says eMarketer senior analyst Paul Verna. "These ads are more geared toward what Digg naturally does."

Digg's 36 million unique visitors are already voting thumbs up or down on content all day long, which will help to encourage feedback into Digg's ad system. One problem that could arise is a user revolt against advertising. If users are consistantly voting down ad content on the site, it could produce a prohibitively high barrier to entry for advertisers.

But Digg is planning to vigilantly check for such aberrations. Anderson tells The New York Times: “The bottom line is, we are going to launch this, we are going to iterate, we are going to listen to what users say and if they have concerns we have ways and plans to deal with it.”

Social advertising may be particularly well suited to Digg, but the real question that remains is if it will be effective enough to help with the problem of monetizing user generated content. Like YouTube, MySpace, and Facebook, that is the main hurdle that Digg is trying to overcome in turning a profit.

Says Verna: "At the end of the day, I don't know if this is really going to make a difference in terms of whether Digg can make user generated content work as an advertising vehicle."

Meghan Keane

Published 4 June, 2009 by Meghan Keane

Based in New York, Meghan Keane is US Editor of Econsultancy. You can follow her on Twitter: @keanesian.

721 more posts from this author

Comments (4)

Avatar-blank-50x50

K Singh, Director at Kronik Media

It sounds interesting and interactive adverts like this may soon become a norm on the internet. But then again, this might also lead to a new form of optimisation service whereby marketing and SEO companies will work towards generating false votes or responses as a method to improve the product profile and branding,

over 7 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Pauly Singh

I’m curious to see how this approach on advertising will work. It could either tank because Digg users will simply vote down all ads, or it could do really well because advertisers will be getting feedback on what types of ads are most effective. I’m hoping (and guessing) it’s the latter and maybe other businesses can implement this type of ad-serving platform to help them earn money. You have to assume that Digg users are aware of this new development and will vote up some of the ads they like.

The knock on traditional CPM advertising has been lack of relevance to the specific target audience and lack of persuasion, so maybe this will help the relevance part of the equation.

over 7 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

K Singh, Director at Kronik Media

Google has also addded a beta comment feature on its search results. Now you can comment on search results and even vote up or down listings. The voting only affects the position of ads on your desktop but the comments are available publicly. Its not used that much as of yet but it can be seen as a start towards interactivity in searches.

over 7 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

ace

I would bury most of the ads. Simply because ads in general have become so annoying these days.

about 7 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.