Online publishers: what would you do to boost your ad revenue? What would you do to prevent your existing advertisers from walking away?

It appears that self-censorship in various forms could be a means of accomplishing both.

The latest evidence of this: the news that celebrity blogger Perez Hilton will be launching a tamer offshoot of his popular blog, While most of the details surrounding Hilton's new site are still unknown, at the OMMA Publishing conference this week, Henry Copeland of, which works with Hilton, made it clear that one reason for the offshoot is to make Hilton more appealing to advertisers.

MediaPost explains:

...Copeland was tight-lipped about details of the online offshoot, but indicated that it would feature longer-form content and appeal more to mainstream advertisers who might not be as comfortable with the sensational, salacious coverage that characterizes

It's not entirely surprising that his team would look to implement a more modest form of self-censorship by creating a more politically-correct offshoot that has Hilton muting his true inner thoughts just a tad. After all, Hilton's popularity now apparently allows him to command six-figure deals.

I think there are a number of things that will drive some publishers to self-censor:

  • A lack of leverage. The recession has caused advertisers to cut back on spending, depressing rates for many publishers. This overall dynamic gives advertisers a significant amount of leverage when it comes to dealing with publishers. If an advertiser has any questions about your content and the implications of being associated with it, the decision to go elsewhere is extremely easy.
  • There's far more sensitivity amongst consumers and advertisers. Case in point: it was reported that Olive Garden decided to pull its ads on the Late Show with David Letterman after a joke he made about Sarah Palin's daughter turned into an ugly media spat. Olive Garden has since stated that no decision to cancel the ads has been made - "yet". Even if Olive Garden decides to stick with Letterman, however, one can be sure that Olive Garden marketing execs are not pleased with the situation; after all, who likes to pay for the privilege of finding their brand stuck in the middle of no-win mediafest?

So is self-censorship ethical? I think Hilton provides a good example of a sensible strategy. He's not ditching the content that got him where he is today; he's simply expanding with a product that will appeal to different consumer and advertiser tastes. If he were to dramatically alter the content on, on the other hand, his audience would no doubt notice and there's a good chance he'd lose part of it, negating some of the benefits of creating a more advertiser-friendly environment.

I suspect Perez Hilton won't be the only online publisher to grapple with this issue.

Photo credit: Oscalito via Flickr.

Patricio Robles

Published 19 June, 2009 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2641 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (2)

David Iwanow

David Iwanow, SEO Product Manager at

I can see why they would be looking at a softer version, but if Perez Hilton loses his edge it will likely dilute his brand and potentially his audience.  It is around risk for the advertiser, if Perez breaks a massive story your brand will get massive exposure where the toned-down site will be less likely to get such breaking stories so you will not get as much exposure.

about 9 years ago


Dollars to Pounds

Hi,Patricio Robles.I agree with you.

about 7 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.