I wrote yesterday wondering why Sky didn't offer one-off coverage of sporting events like the Ashes online, as a way to pull in more revenue and attracting new users.

Having noticed that Sky has since introduced a special offer price of £17 for a month's subscription online, I decided to sign up for it, but discovered that the usability on Sky.com needs some work....

If you go the Sky Player page which is advertised on TV, you get this page which promotes the offer:

Sky Player Ashes offer

With an explanation of the offer and a nice big call to action to sign up for the deal, it seems simple enough, but it gets pretty frustrating from this point onwards.

After pressing the sign up button, you then have the option to select whether or not you are a current Sky customer, but after selecting my option, I was sent straight back to the page above.

This in itself would be enough to deter some customers, but after trying a couple more times, I arrived at the page at a point where it happened to be showing this, one of five possible options:

Having pressed the call to action on the landing page, I would expect to be taken further along the purchase process, having already indicated that I want to sign up. Instead, I'm forced to hunt around for a link to get to the next step in the process.

After finally finding and pressing the subscribe button on this page, you then need to register for a Sky Player account. After this, you then need to press yet another call to action to subscribe, then you finally see some subscription options.

At this point, if you have come for the Ashes offer, let's hope you have remembered the discount code (Ashes09), otherwise you will have to go back to the homepage to find it.

Why not just provide this as an option on the subscription page, rather take the chance that customers might not have noticed the code?

The Sky Player has been heavily promoted during its average coverage so far, and perhaps more people than expected decided to subscribe as a result, because the process was unbelievably slow, and it timed out on me every time I tried to get to the payment screen:

Sky should also ensure it has the capacity to handle a little extra traffic, especially when it is promotong the offer on TV and elsewhere, as slow loading pages like this are guaranteed to put customers off. They may also wonder about the quality of the live coverage if the site is so slow. After trying for ten minutes, I gave up on the idea, and I probably wasn't the only one.

Once customers select to sign up for the offer, they have expressed an intention to buy, but Sky.com is making them work far too hard to actually complete the purchase, which should be a simple process after hitting the sign up button.

The whole subscription process on Sky.com, from showing visitors the Ashes special offer, to selecting the subscription and actually accessing the payment screen, needs to be made more usable for visitors, otherwise Sky risks losing a lot of potential customers.

Graham Charlton

Published 10 July, 2009 by Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton is the former Editor-in-Chief at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or connect via Linkedin or Google+

2565 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (5)


cherry wright

Why aren't the Ashes on BBC?

about 9 years ago

Chris Averill

Chris Averill, CEO at We Are Experience

A while ago I was inovled in a pitch to fix the whole of Sky's products section, purchase paths and members upgrades / self care.

From what I understand it's a bit of a beast (Sky) and therefore takes some changing, and as a basic monopoly what's the rush?

They have done well to sell to so many customers and the firgures on HD uptake are pretty impressive, however, with the likes of HULA and iPlayer starting to get traction in the market, Sky should really sort out the process of buying and upgrading ASAP or risk churn at a time when value is very important to customers and VOD services are starting to look like viable alternatives to Sky.

about 9 years ago



The journey you describe in your review does not reflect most people's first time journey. It looks like you had already registered to the service when you came back and tried to do a review of the registration process. THat's why you had this exprience, which, in theory should not have happened if you were a first time user answer the Ashes campaign.

about 9 years ago



Hear, hear. I also tried to sign up for the service and ended up giving up. Why make it so complicated?

about 9 years ago



Back in July I had a similar experience - going around in circles for half an hour I finally rang Sky.  And I should say that getting hold of their technical support was quite a task in itself.  The woman I spoke to sounded knowledgable, but as she talked me through the process, it became clear that what I was experiencing wasn't something they knew about.  After about 40 minutes being talked through what to do, and then being held on the phone while she asked the boss, she decided that my firewall (which is standard AVG) must be the problem and that I would have to change some of the drivers in order to allow me to sign up.

Needless to say I gave up at this point.

Truly pathetic.  It should have been part of the deal with the ECB that Sky should provide simple, affordable online access to the cricket.

almost 9 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.