{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Facebook claims that its recent problems with click fraud are behind it but one advertiser is sending Facebook a clear message: your problems are just beginning.

Sports website RootZoo has filed a lawsuit against Facebook in federal district court in San Jose, California and is seeking class action status. The company is being represented by Kabatek Brown Kellner, a law firm with a history of litigating click fraud actions.

Like other advertisers who complained, RootZoo alleges that there were significant discrepancies between the number of clicks it received through Facebook's self-serve PPC ad platform and the number of clicks it was charged for. According to RootZoo's complaint, on a single day, Facebook billed it for 804 clicks when its own logs showed only 300. RootZoo claims that Facebook has refused to provide its own logs for review or to issue a refund.

Facebook has dismissed RootZoo's claims as being "unnecessary and baseless".

Officially, Facebook says that the recent problems with click fraud have been addressed. Although some went so far as to suggest that Facebook was artificially inflating click counts, there is a technical explanation as to how Facebook could register a click while the tracking systems on advertiser websites didn't: an automated bot could send a request to Facebook, generating a 'click' but then terminating before the redirect generates a request on the advertiser's server.

While it's far too early to predict where RootZoo's lawsuit will lead, two points should be made:

  • This is potentially a significant blow to Facebook. Its self-serve PPC ad platform generates a sizable chunk of its revenue and this entire situation is certainly raises questions about Facebook's ability to run a decent PPC service. Facebook cannot afford a loss of confidence at this stage of its development. Additionally, it's worth considering that historically, there have been quite a few reports that ROI is difficult to extract from Facebook; for advertisers on the fritz, fraudulent activity has the potential to turn Facebook into a lost cause. If fraud contributes to enough advertisers throwing in the towel, look out.
  • Facebook may not be taking action against the scammers. According to a post on TechCrunch, how scammers are engaging in click fraud on Facebook is now common knowledge. Unfortunately, TechCrunch reports that Facebook may not be shutting down the thousands of accounts that scammers set up to engage in click fraud. If true, this could be very problematic, especially as far as Facebook's legal defense is concerned.

The lesson in all this is that running a self-serve ad platform like AdWords has become a big business for Facebook but reality has struck: if you're going to take people's money, you had better be prepared to defend yourself when they think they've been given the short end of the stick.

Photo credit: tjshirey via Flickr.

Patricio Robles

Published 10 July, 2009 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2380 more posts from this author

Comments (2)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Matthew Smith

Interesting update to this. I think the bottom line is it doesn't matter if a) they committed fraud or b) their system is broken and allows it - the level of inflation of clicks that is being talked about is enough to turn everyone off to the platform.

about 7 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Tuyo Isaza

Well, This same happend a few years back to adClick.

Thing is, that this discrepancy is COMMON in most of admedia in the internet.

Specially in the tradicional CPM purchases.

Since PPC started it has become an special issue.

There are several theories on this, going from bad programming to malware bots. Like Clickbot.A if you care to remember back a few years.

Most likely caused by people doing click and stoping the process clicking somewhere else.

I dont think is badly intended, just a fact.

Now, on a PPC scenario is NECESARY to work it out, and get a refund if necesary. But i would not o as far as saying that is Facebook to get profit.

A law suit might be needed to execute it, but this just goes to remind us that if your are working in Internet, you better be woriking in BETA MODE. =)

about 7 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.