Is a generic, category-defining domain name worth millions of dollars? To some, it has been. The world was put on notice of that in 1999 when was bought for a then-record-breaking $7.5m.

Since that time, there have been plenty of seven-figure domain name sales. One of them came last month when changed hands for $3m. The seller: Rick Schwartz, one of the best-known domainers. The buyer: G&J Holdings, run by confectionary executives (and cousins) Joe Melville and Greg Balestrieri.

Less than two months later, is live and as you may have guessed, it's being used to sell candy. So I decided to take a look at and see how a $3m domain name investment gets turned into a functional online retail business.

The Good

  • has a lot of the functionality consumers have come to expect from online retailers. There's the typical shopping cart, order tracking, a wish list, gift registry, email a friend, customer reviews, related items, etc. Since is powered by a third-party ecommerce platform, it didn't have to reinvent the wheel.
  • The browsing experience is fairly smooth. Candies can be viewed based on type, brand, color, flavor and occasion through the site's navigation and DHTML drop-down menus make it easy to drill down into those areas.
  • Live customer service is available online via chat during business hours and the site's contact page lists a toll-free phone number.
  • is taking advantage of a variety of sales tools that many new online retailers overlook or don't take advantage of, namely a rewards program, affiliate program and gift cards.
  • The footer of features logos of the accepted payment methods, its shipping provider (UPS), the VeriSign SSL cert and a McAfee Secure seal. While some question whether these are useful, my personal experience is that they do help reassure some consumers.

The Bad

  • The logo. It's 'cute' but a little bit too over-the-top in my opinion.
  • The interface is a little rough around the edges and in my opinion, is slightly amateurish. While I might be nitpicky, I couldn't help but notice inconsistencies with spacing, padding, etc. and think more attention to detail could have been paid. Case in point: when the site first launched, one of the graphics read "Shipping Statment".
  • There's definitely room for some SEO. Example: the page for pastel candy simply uses "Pastel Candy" for the page title and meta description.

The Question

Overall, I think is a really decent effort, especially when compared to some of its competitors. The $3m question, however, is: is the domain worth $3m?

There are a few easy ways to evaluate this:

  • Traffic-wise, tracked less than 15,000 unique US visitors per month to before its sale was announced in June. Traffic shot up to just under 30,000 unique visitors in June; it will be interesting to see if the increase holds and is built upon. Looking at one of's biggest competitors shows that the upstart has a hill to climb: tracked 135,000 unique US visitors to in June; it has received as many as 279,000 unique visitors in month this year.
  • The idea that generic domain names, because of their natural type-in traffic, largely eliminate the need to spend on marketing is often flawed. Here, a search for 'candy' on Google US shows that is competing heavily on AdWords; it currently occupies the second position. So add marketing costs on to the $3m price tag. What effect the '' domain has on AdWords performance is unknown.
  • appears to be on the fourth page of Google's organic search results for the keyword 'candy'. It doesn't appear to be in the first five pages for high-volume keywords like 'bulk candy', 'candy basket' and 'gift candy'. While it's still very early in the game for, its less-generic competitors have a big head start in the SERPs.

But there's so much more to an analysis than just the numbers.'s success will most likely boil down to one thing: execution. Zappos, which Amazon just acquired for close to a billion dollars, may not have been but with a solid business model, the right products, a top-notch supply chain infrastructure and rabid customer service, the name didn't matter at all.

Photo credit: terren in Virginia via Flickr.

Patricio Robles

Published 24 July, 2009 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2641 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (3)

John Pyle

John Pyle, Web Developer at Southwind Web Services

It's true that the success of will depend on execution, but given equally good execution as any given competitor, the generic domain should win out with less 'like for like' marketing spend.

almost 9 years ago


Jason Smith, SEO Manager at RapidSSLOnline

Well...the good factors definitely look temptous. A shopping cart, good browsing experience, a Verisign certificate and a macfee security seal. Whatelse can one ask for? And i think that the bad factors can be dealt with. But as john said, its success will depend on how it is used.

over 7 years ago



Thanks for finally writing about >Looking at the recently-launched $3m domain name, | Econsultancy <Liked it!

over 5 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.