{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

An interesting post by Erick Schonfeld at TechCrunch details how Nielsen has been "gushing" about Facebook since it partnered with the giant social network on a service called BrandLift, which is designed to help advertisers measure the effectiveness of their ad campaigns on the site.

One report Nielsen issued after it teamed up with Facebook highlights just how much time consumers are spending on social networks, and Facebook in particular. Another provided data showing that affluent consumers are more likely to be using it than MySpace. The obvious question: is Nielsen presenting objective data to advertisers or is it overhyping its newest partner?

Companies like Nielsen and comScore are extremely important to advertisers, agencies and publishers alike. To some, they're a little bit too important. After all, their data often heavily influences media buying decisions. Which means that if Nielsen is going out of its way to extol the virtues of Facebook, it could potentially throw the company's credibility into question.

The question then is whether Nielsen is sticking to reporting the facts or whether it is now actively engaging in spin to benefit a partner. And that's a tough question to answer. Facebook is wildly popular and few can question that advertisers have good reason to target consumers on social networks. It's where they are online, after all. So the Nielsens of the world have to cover this space and they can't ignore that Facebook is massive.

Yet a look behind the numbers does raise some questions. The goal of advertising is not advertising for advertising's sake. While it may be worth pointing out that Facebook was the top social network for advertisers in 10 out of 13 industries in August as measured by ad impressions, ad impressions alone don't really tell us much. Neither does the fact that Facebook apparently has a more "upscale" audience than MySpace and Twitter, social networks that are both used quite differently by consumers.

Going even further, it's worth pointing out that Facebook has historically received a bad rap when it comes to ad performance. That's not to say that there aren't ads that do well but one cannot discount the fact that a handful of companies reportedly account for a large chunk of the company's revenue. This is a reminder that aggregate numbers are not always indicative of broad trends.

At the end of the day, I think it's valid to point out that Nielsen seems to be doing its new partner Facebook a lot of favors with its research and PR. Whether it's selectively focusing in on metrics that overhype Facebook's strengths, while ignoring Facebook's weaknesses, is a matter of personal perception. I think a reasonable conclusion is that there might not be a malevolent conspiracy behind Nielsen's coverage of Facebook given that Facebook is so prominent anyway, but it demonstrates that there really is no such thing as objectivity when it comes to data these days.

And that is precisely why advertisers and agencies need to be smart about their media buying. Nielsen and comScore data is very valuable, but nothing is a substitute for common sense. Plan campaigns thoughtfully, choose the right metrics to monitor and figure out an acceptable formula for evaluating ROI. If a campaign succeeds based on the chosen criteria, scale it. If it doesn't, no amount of Nielsen and comScore data should distract you from the obvious.

Photo credit: jaycameron via Flickr.

Patricio Robles

Published 30 September, 2009 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2393 more posts from this author

Comments (1)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Estelle Green

I would not be surprised if Nielson are not doing both. I'm sure the results of their research into engagement and time spent on social media are positive and they are using it as an excuse to promote their new partnership with Facebook.

over 3 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.