It seems like every few months, somebody has to write a blog post calling SEO a 'scam' of some sort. It's a meme that always works and this time around, it's coming from a guy named Derek Powazek, who calls SEOs "spammers, evildoers, and opportunists".

It's a great linkbait, which, ironically, is sure to help Powazek's SERPs.

Like most 'SEO is a scam' linkbait, the arguments are fatally flawed. So let's begin.

1. Derek says: "The good advice is obvious, the rest doesn’t work."

First, while there's some truth to the notion that "the good advice is obvious", Powazek misses the point that the devil is in the details. Even if you're using good titles, formatting your markup properly, etc., that's just the beginning. Just because you've built a page that employs a good title, for instance, doesn't necessarily mean that there isn't room for improvement.

Powazek's arguments start to fall apart almost immediately, however, when he writes:

Occasionally a darkside SEO master may find some loophole in the Google algorithm to exploit, which might actually lead to an increase in traffic. But that ill-gotten traffic gain won’t last long. Google changes the way it ranks its index monthly (if not more), so even if some SEO technique worked, and usually they don’t, it’ll last for a couple weeks, tops.

First, Powazek seems to be a little bit confused about how frequently Google releases major algorithm updates. Not surprising, of course.

Second, SEO isn't really about techniques so much as it is about knowledge. It's about understanding the relative importance of both on-page and off-page ranking factors. Once you understand them, of course, you can try to influence them. I'm sure Powazek would cringe at the thought that the domain name is an important ranking factor for Google and that people actually use this to their advantage (and have been for some time). In fact, this ranking factor probably has a lot to do with the reason Powazek's website, Fray, which is located at, ranks so well for "fray" on Google. Just because he didn't know about this ranking factor when he purchased the domain name doesn't make the ranking factor any less real (or important for somebody who recognizes the benefits of keyword domains).

2. Derek says: "SEO is poisoning the web."

This is where Powazek's arguments really fall apart like a bad football team. Powazek writes:

Google’s ranking algorithm is based on links. So the most effective way to game their system is to plant links on as many sites as possible, all pointing to your site, linked from specific keywords. This is called Google bombing.

SEO cockroaches employ botnets, third-world labor, and zombie computers to blanket the web with link spam. 99% of spam comments to blogs are these kind of links. The target of these links is not the blog readers, it’s Google.

SEO bastards are behind worms that attack blog services like Blogger, WordPress, and Movable Type. Some hack into the blog templates themselves to insert links that are hidden from the readers of that blog, but visible to a Google crawler.

First of all, the people engaging in this behavior aren't 'SEOs'. The SEO looking to optimize his client's websites isn't running a botnet of 50,000 compromised computers and hacking websites, for obvious reasons. The people who are doing these things are criminals who are usually looking to spread malware. Calling them SEOs is sort of like calling thieves 'waiters' because a few thieves work at a restaurant during the day.

Second, the most effective way to "game" Google's algorithm is not to "plant links on as many sites as possible". Clearly, Powazek doesn't understand how Google evaluates backlinks. They are, of course, not all created equal. While it's not surprising that Powazek doesn't know this, anyone who has spent 30 minutes reading about SEO knows that Google isn't just counting the number of backlinks you have and pumping up your SERPs if it's a big number.

Third, the poisonous techniques that Powazek lists -- comment spam, stolen RSS content, hacking, etc. -- are generally ineffective, something that Powazek would know if he took the time to research what he was writing. Most blogging platforms nofollow comments, Google is quite good at identifying duplicate content and it often identifies hacked websites (and drops them like a bad habit) before the owners even know they've been hacked.

Powazek shouldn't assume that because criminals employ such techniques, they're effective, or that they're exclusively targeting SERPs. The reason criminals do these things is because the cost of doing them is so low. Any benefit whatsoever (and not necessarily SERP-driven) can deliver a significant ROI.

Ironically, Powazek ends with high-level advice fit for an SEO:

  1. Create great content.
  2. Tell people about it.

The latter sort of sounds like what you're doing with a link building campaign, no?

All in all, Powazek's linkbait really doesn't add much but is notable for its misguided vitriol. That's why it's worth responding to. Unfortunately, we can expect this meme to arise again soon in a new form. Let's hope that it will be more original and informed the next time around.

Photo credit: Nima Badiey via Flickr.

Patricio Robles

Published 14 October, 2009 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2641 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (10)

Save or Cancel


And yet you gave him a link?

almost 9 years ago

Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles, Tech Reporter at Econsultancy


Since SEO doesn't exist, that link doesn't exist. :)

almost 9 years ago


Darren Cronian

I have lost how many time I have read tips from SEO people who have said that you should try and do posts that generate links. Well, that's all that post is. Nothing wrong with it, and it probably has some truths in it. I wrote a similar post but more aimed towards travel PR/SEO agencies.

almost 9 years ago


Dan Nedelko

A decent rebuttal to a wholly uninformed link baiting attempt. I've been in the Internet Marketing industry for over 7 years and every few months a post like this surfaces.

In general I tend to ignore anyone who makes blanket statements regarding what SEO is and is not. Of particular note: large ecommerce sites do not have the simple luxury of posting content and they will come.

The devil is in fact in the details, in the product page structures, in the URL structures, in the user path analysis once a visitor hits the site.

SEO is one channel in the greater scope of Internet Marketing which also includes PPC, Rich Media, Social Network Marketing, Email Marketing, Web Analytics, Conversion Rate Optimization and Client Retention.

The original author is not only exposing himself as uninformed but incredibly ignorant (in the worst sense of the word).

You simply cannot build it and they will come. Strategic marketing, planning and execution are required to succeed in the online landscape.

almost 9 years ago

James Gurd

James Gurd, Owner at Digital JugglerSmall Business Multi-user

Evening all.

The problem with posts like Derek's is that they illicit a response because people don't want those not in the know getting the wrong impression of legitimate marketing techniques/tools. However, getting a response is what is desired, thus keeping this type of post coming. A lovely vicious circle.

I would be interested to know what SEO blogs you all use to stay up to date with latest trends/techniques. I follow the main Google blog and also tune in to SEOptimise and SEOMoz when I have the time - anyone I should be following who really knows what's going on?



almost 9 years ago


Doug Stewart

Attention: All spammers, evildoers and opportunists. Try your hand at SEO. You'll make the big bucks in no time. No one will catch your flim, flam ways. Powazek has spoken.

almost 9 years ago


Kruse Internet Services

"It's about understanding the relative importance of both on-page and off-page ranking factors"

Well... yeah... I guess... but really it's about identifying them first and optimising them according to best practice. Algos shift around, the SERPS follow, (the everflux) but a well-optimised on-topic site usually shows well in most circumstances, assuming it's not up against an overwhelming number of others. There's only so many on-page factors the engines have available so it's more a case of working through them all. Prioritising can be idiosyncratic so long as in a reasonable time you cover everything properly.


almost 9 years ago


Steve Gorney

I read about this battle of "good vs. evil" everyday. Here is how I break it down to may clients. That is what is important to me and them.

People use the Internet in many different ways. This must be analyzed. Some want to be educated. Some want arousal. Some want to make friends. Some want to buy stuff. Some use it as a big phone book/yellow pages. If people want to buy stuff or use it as a yellow pages, we want to help them FIND YOU. That is what SEO does.

almost 9 years ago


Vincent Roman

What an excellent riposte!

The devil is in the detail, and sometimes this is the kind of stuff eople don't want to do themselves.  I suppose the only thing thing being successfully acheived here is that Derek gets his name out there and appears to make a complete clown out of himself.

over 8 years ago


Damian Doman

One cannot criticise SEO unless they have an expert knowledge about it and somethign valuable to share. Otherwise, the criticism is not reliable at all.

How can Derek call SEOs "spammers, evildoers and opportunists" if it takes one article to prove his ignorance?

Especially that almost everyone who applies SEO to the websites, has only positive results. People that object to it, probably have little or no experience in the subject.

over 8 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.