Online video may be providing some much needed ROI for advertisers desperate to reach online viewers, but video ads do not work universally across platforms online. According to ad server EyeBlaster, video ads are not performing well in social media.

Why is that? Well, for starters, people don't spend enough time lingering on specific pages in social to view them.

Eyeblaster's report looked at thousands of brands and found that video ads outperform in relation to editorial content, specifically news, finance, music and sports, but lag in social environments. Over the three and a half years, the study found video impressions grew 60% faster than rich media impressions.

It all comes down to "dwell time" — the amount of time that people spend looking at a page online. Eyeblaster found that video ads generally boost "dwell rate" — the proportion of time spent clicking or lingering over an ad — by 20%. In areas that video ads perform well, they yield double the ROI of non-video rich media.

But that all changes in social, where users browse very quickly and tend not to linger. Ariel Geifman, research analyst at Eyeblaster, tells Econsultancy:

"People do spend ample time on social networks, but not as much on a single page.  Users may log in and out multiple times per day, or browse between pages more quickly.  As a result, the performance of video ads in these environments is inferior as compared to other environments."

In sectors like gaming, where users engage with the interface for longer periods, they see an ad for longer, but there are drawbacks. Gamers are less likely to actually click on an ad while playing, so gaming ads work better for branding purposes. Eyeblaster found that video ads perform best when next to static content that takes longer to consume. Says Geifman:

"Video works well in environments with more in-depth content, such as news, finance and email. In these environments, users spend ample time on the same webpage reading content (or in the email case also writing content). When users spend a long time on the same page, they are more inclined to engage with ads, and with video ads in particular. We’ve seen that video ads require users to spend more time on the page due to the time it takes for the ads to load, and play to their full duration. When users spend more time reading in-depth content, they engage with video ads more frequently, and ultimately, allow more videos to play to their full duration."

Video is a rapidly growing segment, with 161 million U.S. internet users watching online video during August of this year, according to comScore. And Nielsen registered that the number of video streams watched by U.S. viewers increased by 24.8% between September of 2008 and September 2009. The average time per viewer also increased by 24.8% over the same time period.

Which makes it likely that video will start performing better in social when users get more accustomed with the medium — and publishers adjust their inventory according to browsing habits.

"It's not about the mind-set, it's the browsing habits. That said, people don't browse [in social] as they do in news and finance, where they read an article and have more time to look at an ad," says Giefman. "Video is still a very much emerging medium, and this is a picture of video right now. People will continue find ways of engaging people in different environments."

Image: MaximumPC

Meghan Keane

Published 19 November, 2009 by Meghan Keane

Based in New York, Meghan Keane is US Editor of Econsultancy. You can follow her on Twitter: @keanesian.

721 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (3)

Avatar-blank-50x50

James Robertson, Web Marketing Manager at www.venuebirmingham.com

"egage" with content? - "watchingonline"? "Video is a rapidly gorwing segment"? Erm - guys - you need to spellcheck or proofread your content....

over 8 years ago

Meghan Keane

Meghan Keane, US Editor at Econsultancy

Fixed. Sorry about that.

over 8 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Chris Terschluse

I think this perspective that video ads do not work on social networks is somewhat flawed.  One of the key characteristics of social media marketing is getting users to syndicate or share content (essentially word-of-mouth marketing) across the network to friends/family etc.  When marketers approach a social network like the typical web page, buying display or banner ads that incorporate video, it is easy to see why they fail.  The true value of social networks is realized when people share content. Online video is one of the most shared forms of multimedia (how do you think YouTube videos go viral). I don't think its the users that need to become accustomed to social networks, but rather the marketers utilizing them need to understand their true potential. 

over 8 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.