{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

The self-inflicted wounds Facebook received from its new privacy setup are getting deeper as some users pull their information, and others quit the social network altogether.

While I think that a lot of the criticism being leveled at Facebook is hyperbole, Facebook's new privacy regime does represent an almost 180-degree turn for the world's largest social network.

When Facebook launched, it was a private network reserved exclusively for students and alumni at a handful of schools. But over time, as it has opened up to the world at large, it has also become more public. The motivation for this is simple: it will be impossible for Facebook to grow into the company it needs to be financially as a closed, private network. Right?

Maybe not. Much of Facebook's popularity is derived from its private nature. Even as Facebook opened up its membership, it largely left in place controls making it possible for users to maintain their privacy. Those controls are now pretty much gone, replaced with a confusing array of options clearly designed to make it difficult for users to share less of themselves with the world.

But Barry Schnitt, Facebook's Director of Corporate Communications and Public Policy, has a solution for that: lie. That's right. He told the Wall Street Journal that users can falsify certain portions of their Facebook profiles.

TechCrunch's Jason Kincaid noticed the conflict between his comment and Facebook's terms of use, and reached out to Schnitt, who reiterated:

...you don’t have to indicate your current city or you can indicate that your current city is “Atlantis”, “Valhalla” or, again, anything you like. We hope people will use accurate information if they are comfortable doing so because that information helps them to be found by their friends, which is part of the point of joining the site.

This might seem like an innocuous comment but Facebook's fortunes might hinge on whether or not Schnitt truly represents with his position.

Here's why: Facebook is sitting on a gold mine. Although Facebook will reportedly pull in approximately $500mn in revenue this year, most of that from advertising, much of the Facebook gold mine hasn't been tapped yet.

The gold in that gold mine, course, is user data of various kinds, from profile details to the social graph. It has immense value because it gives and will give Facebook the ability to develop innovative solutions that connect advertisers to members of Facebook's massive audience. How'd Facebook acquire its gold mine? As my colleague Meghan Keane pointed out yesterday, users have felt comfortable sharing their personal information and content with Facebook. And for good reason: prior to Facebook's about-face, much of it was hidden from public view by default. Something unique to Facebook in the realm of major social networks.

But Facebook's new anti-privacy approach may very well kill the goose that laid the golden egg. If Facebook users think twice about sharing accurate information with Facebook, and go back and remove or falsify the information they've already shared, Facebook will suffer. But it's advertisers who may suffer even more. That's because the amount and quality of the data that Facebook can give them access to as they look to target Facebook users will decrease.

Sure, Facebook can still use basic geolocation tools to figure out that you don't like in Atlantis, for instance. But what happens when users start removing other small but valuable pieces of personal information? In the aggregate, it could hamper Facebook's quest to realize the social networking dream: the ability to build a complete portrait of each individual user which can be used by an advertiser to target him or her with pinpoint precision efficiently in a one-to-one fashion.

Facebook is still far from realizing that dream, but make no doubt about it: if any company has ever had the potential to pull it off, it's Facebook. But thanks to short-sighted thinking and confusion over its identity, that dream may remain just a dream. Better luck next time, advertisers. Facebook would rather own a stream than a gold mine.

Photo credit: Andrew Feinberg via Flickr.

Patricio Robles

Published 16 December, 2009 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2391 more posts from this author

Comments (4)

Avatar-blank-50x50

yepper

Yep, I already removed about 60 fan pages, everything from where I shopped to what political candidates I supported, to what charities I wanted information on.  I also deleted my groups about not-smoking and everything that indicated what city or income level I am in. 

Good luck with marketing to me. I am encouraging all my friends to do the same, and reminding them - every time I get notified that they just joined a new fan page- that EVERYONE on the internet can see that they like to shop at Walmart or that they like watching Desperate Housewives and the Bad Girls' Club.  Good luck with targetting us facebook users from now on.  We are giving you nothing... or just fanning the pages that we don't care about but would look good on a resume.  We are not using it for personal reasons anymore and are not showing anyone our true preferences anymore.

I hope Zuckerburg likes sleeping with a teddy on a friend's couch, because that's where he will have to be sleeping in a couple of years, unless he is able to dump off his company to some sucka before then. 

over 6 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Huxley Dunmire PR

I think you've got this spot on, who would have thought they could be so blind. I have seen a good percentage of users actually cancel their accounts, but the majority are just sharing much less information with even those they consider close. 

great article!

over 6 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

The SEO Stategist

With this move, they're trying to force Facebook beyond the limits of its natural growth. It's grown as large as it has because it has the nature it does. Remove the nature, you remove the reason for the growth in the first place. You get the feeling there's all these wannabee billionaires running round the place trying to find something they can be in charge of that can grow big enough to feed their egos and their lifestyles. Facebook ain't it, and in trying to make it it, they broke it. Everyone should go home, take a quiet pill and read Schumacher's Small Is Beautiful, reminding themselves all the while that small is a relative term.

BB

over 6 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Beth

Yes, great article.  I think Facebook may have shot themselves in the foot with this one - a number of my friends have "disapeared" over the last few days.  People are paranoid enough what with all the publicity around employers and prospective employers using Facebook to snoop.  For many the new privacy setup may be a step too far and they will simply close their accounts rather than try to manage access to their information.

Beth

over 6 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.