{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

As I’m sure everyone reading this will know, the Christmas sales period represents not only one of the busiest periods of the year for online advertising but also one of the last pushes before budgets are reviewed for the new year.

The last two years have put more pressure on ad budgets than most working in the industry are likely to remember and, without exception, everyone’s being more careful about their marketing spend. However, is there a danger that thriftiness in buying ad space could be limiting the scope of brands’ campaigns?

In short, do preferred partner, commercial agreements between ad agencies and publishers threaten media neutrality?

A simple way in which agencies can make their money go further is by entering into commercial partnerships with preferred publishing partners, generally big websites or networks who are over a certain profit threshold, that can offer discounted ad space in exchange for yearly spend contracts.  

This is not at all an uncommon practice, and all well and good you might think, but there is a concern, particularly at this time of year and with the current squeeze, that pressure to reach the annual target spend may influence some of the bigger advertising agencies to push their clients towards their preferred partners rather than suggesting more appropriate, targeted outlets.

As preferred partners tend to be larger websites, niche specialist sites lose out as agencies are restricted as to how much they can invest in them.

The problem is that, if un-checked, the practice of preferred partner status could mean that big publishers can essentially create a monopoly, influencing the media neutrality of some, bigger advertising agencies.  

This could in turn be to the detriment of a brand’s campaign. Research has continually demonstrated that targeted campaigns on relevant, niche websites typically have a higher response rate than advertising on the larger, more generic websites.

Specialist sites tend to have a loyal following of consumers who are more likely to engage with adverts on the site, which they see as having the endorsement of their trusted website. 

In my view, as more campaigns are now being paid for based on a results rather than through a pay-per-click model, the practice of preferred partner networks will ultimately become self-defeating and will have to evolve to meet the needs to the clients.

The industry needs to ensure, as a self-regulating body, that we don’t confuse better rates with better advertising. 

Harvey Sarjant

Published 23 December, 2009 by Harvey Sarjant

Harvey Sarjant is managing partner at Addvantage Media and a guest blogger at Econsultancy.

5 more posts from this author

Comments (2)

Avatar-blank-50x50

chinese wholesalers

yes,it`s so busy in these days,many budgets have been trading in the market

almost 7 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

winter boots

if they drift from the core essence of Mickey (which I see is largely as a guide in life teachings to the young at heart) then it will be a sad day and any commercial success will be short lived.
cheers
Miro

about 6 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.