The two main party leaders are failing to protect their personal brands in the search results, with unofficial and negative websites ranking in the first page of Google.

This is one of the findings from the Political Search Index by Tamar, which has looked into the online reputation management strategies of the party leaders.

The results for searches for both Labour and Conservative are in general relevant, containing many official websites, with the only negatives being a Labour PPC ad questioning George Osborne's spending plans.

However, it's a different story when you search for either David Cameron or Gordon Brown. Each set of results has an unofficial blog ( and which is highly critical of each leader.

Both of these sites rank highly too; fifth on the first page of Google in the case of Cameron, and eighth for Gordon Brown.

In the case of Gordon Brown, the fact that an estate agent from Chester-le-Street has the same name as the PM means that it takes up three of the first page results.

There is also the issue of social media. While Gordon Brown has a Twitter account under the DowningStreet name, there are no other Twitter accounts in the name of either Brown or Cameron, though there are plenty of imposters.

Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg seems to be more on the ball, with both an official website in his name and a Twitter account, both of which show up on the first page of Google.

Since profiles on social media sites can rank very highly in the search engines, both party leaders are missing a trick by not having official accounts.

People are talking about Brown and Cameron on Twitter, and this can often be negative, as the screenshot below shows, and  these results will be showing up regularly on Google searches:

With the introduction of real time search, politicians, as well as brands, need to take social search optimisation seriously. Simply opening Twitter and Facebook accounts in the names of senior figures can make a difference. 

Graham Charlton

Published 8 January, 2010 by Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton is the former Editor-in-Chief at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or connect via Linkedin or Google+

2565 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (1)

Grant Whiteside

Grant Whiteside, Technical Director at Ambergreen Internet Marketing

Both parties have failed miserably to put out a strategic plan of action. Neither seem to have a proactive agenda, talking about not only the parties or their leaders but the issues of why we should or shouldn't vote for them.

This is an election that can be won by maximising the political online reputations, as there are no real differences in policies in a climate where the economy is in such dissaray.

Neither party has tried to maximise local search, local links, real time polls, online PR or a whole load of universal search options.

It seems as if  they are frightened of talking to the people and what the feedback may look like in the format of user generated content.

If there are agencies allegedly working for these parties, they are not doing a good job of it.

Grant Whiteside

Ambergreen Internet Marketing

over 8 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.