{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Budget airlines EasyJet and Ryanair have made great strides in terms of website usability, while British Airways provides the best online experience overall, according to a new study. 

Webcredible's 2010 Flights Online study has assessed the websites of 20 UK travel agent and airline websites against usability best practice guidelines.

BA is top with a score of 78%, followed by EasyJet on 77% and Virgin Atlantic on 75%. Ryanair, bottom is last year's study, has improved to reach eighth place with a score of 66%. 

Budget airlines improve online 

In the same study last year, budget airlines scored very poorly, with four achieving marks of less than 50%. 

Last year, EasyJet was placed at 15 with a score of 50%; this year it is second with 77%, while Ryanair has improved from 41% to 66%. 

In the case of Ryanair, it has improved in a number of areas, from providing more functionality to help customers during the booking process, and providing clear error messaging and showing users how to resolve errors. 

In the case of EasyJet, had it provided a clear contact number, it would have been top of the study. 

Travel disruption and communications

The recent disruption of flights caused by volcanic ash meant that airlines needed to provide up to date information to customers hoping to get flights. (Icelandair provided a great example of how this could be achieved). 

Webcredible found that 17 of the 20 sites studied provided information and customer alerts on the homepage, though some did this more clearly than others. This kind a messaging should be displayed prominently on the homepage where it cannot be missed, but some sites didn't make these alerts clear enough. 

British Airways provides a prominent alert on the homepage about the cabin crew strike, with links to further information: 

Providing contact numbers

A clear contact number acts as a trustmark for customers when shopping online, and also provides a route for people to seek assistance or reassurance during the booking process, but this is one area where overall scores were low, with half the sites studied scoring one or less out of five. 

It is the carriers' website which are the biggest culprits here, with an average score of 0.8, compared with 3.2 for travel agents. Even some of those that do have contact numbers don't make them clear enough, or even charge customers for them, in the case of Ryanair. 

This is an area where travel sites are missing an opportunity to convert more customers. Travel products can be complex and customers are likely to have some questions they would like answered before they book, while others may simply prefer to research flight availability and prices online before booking through another channel. 

By providing a clear contact number, these customers can get the reassurance they require before booking their holidays. 

Graham Charlton

Published 9 June, 2010 by Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton is the former Editor-in-Chief at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or connect via Linkedin or Google+

2565 more posts from this author

Comments (1)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Eric Reiss

Curious that British Airways fared so well. My experience is significantly different. May I ask if this study checked the following parameters:

Does the site display properly in Safari on a Mac? (it didn't on earlier versions)

Does it display well on AOL? (I still can't get it to work on AOL - PC or Mac)

Can you use the site with a dial-up connection (in my experience, a 56K modem takes several minutes per click)

Did you check if the BA site now will issue boarding cards for the entire route Miami-Copenhagen (via London)? In the old days, BA would only book as far as London as the system did not recognize international time differences and therefore refused to book the last leg of the flight, which it insisted was actually the next day and therefore outside the 24-hour check-in limit.

Have you tried to book a child AFTER you booked the parents? I couldn't do it as of two months ago. BA never did answer my e-mails or tweets in this regard. Had to go to the airport extra early to get this sorted as the parents were already booked - BA was unable to get three seats together, so we had to trade with folks once on board. Not a good experience.

Oh well...

over 6 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.