{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

It's reasonable that the average organic search engine marketer is feeling fairly embattled in recent times.  

Not only are they under assault from the increasingly rapid pace of change within its algorithm, but it seems that Google is also making it ever more difficult to measure the real effect of SEO related changes.

The most obvious issue is the rise of the (not provided) keyphrase referrer in analytics. This was launched in a blaze of publicity in late 2011 for users signed into Google services, but the amount of traffic referred by (not provided) has been stealthily increasing ever since.  

The decision of Firefox to configure HTTPS (secure) searches by default further added to the issue.  

My own personal frustration at the fact that our own site analytics shows that over 50% of our organic traffic over the past month is now referrer (not provided) prompted me to look at the levels for our clients.  

As an agency who have over 50 clients, we have access to the analytics of a diverse range of businesses and a look at some of these returned some interesting correlations.

It could be argued that our site attracts a primarily technical and marketing savvy audience, who are more likely to be signed into Google services,and are therefore likely to land on our site as (not provided) visitors.  

This is seems to be borne out by looking at the data from other IT and technical clients that we work with.

Overall, our client base of different types seems to see;

  • IT, marketing and technical: 50% (not provided).
  • Community sites (social networks, forums etc), 40% (not provided).
  • Mainstream ecommerce, 20% (not provided)
  • Travel and Tourism, 15% (not provided)
  • (It's around 40% of organic search traffic on Econsultancy - ed)

The rise of (not provided) on Econsultancy.

These numbers are averages of a relatively large range, but they do appear to give a general trend and one that can at least partially be explained by the propensity of the audiences for logging into Google services.

At the risk of making sweeping generalisations, it's probably fair to say that technical or marketing website managers are more likely to be logged into Google Analytics, AdWords or even Google+ as default, than travel and tourism business operators.  

I'd be interested to know whether these numbers broadly fit with other peoples experiences.  

It's certainly arguable that another contributing factor to all of this might be the rise in popularity of the Google+ platform - over 500m users now claimed by Google (although I'm personally hugely cycnical about the number of "active users in this number).  

It's also important to note that this is not simply a Google Analytics related issue. Users of any other analytics platform, including the £90,000 per year Google Analytics Premium product, are equally affected.  

Google of course justifies the situation by claiming that it protects the security of the user and their keyphrase searches now that they are signed in and therefore no longer anonymous, but this does seem somewhat debatable when you consider the fact that this data is readily available for paid Adwords traffic.  

So, how do we circumvent this parlous state of affairs?  

Webmaster tools

Well, the first thing to do is undoubtedly check your Google Webmaster Tools account, assuming that you have this configured.  

GWT will provide average keyphrase position data for your site, which is useful so long as you bear in mind that this is average data rather than absolute, so should be used as a guide rather than a hard and fast truth.  

Landing page analysis

There are also some useful things that you can do within Google Analytics that at least help retrieve some of the information that Google has removed from us. The primary weapon in your armoury here is the landing page analysis functionality in Google Analytics.  

Select your (not provided) data and drill into "Landing Page" and you will see the most popular pages that (not provided) visitors landed on. This is not precise, but will give you a good feeling for what these people were looking for.  

You may then wish to supplement this by setting up some custom reports in Analytics that enable you to analyse visit duration, bounce rate, conversion rate and any other metrics that will help you define how much your (not provided) data is contributing.  

The battle is made yet harder by the fact that Google seems hell bent on placing other hurdles in the path of people wishing to measure their organic keyprase positioning in the search results.  

There are undoubtedly numerous reasons why straightforward keyphrase monitoring is not a long term way to measure your organic search presence, but nonetheless, it's easily understandable, cost effective and still the preferred modus operandi for the majority of businesses.  

That is, until Google decided to make it harder for keyphrase monitoring tools to scrape ranking data from the Google SERPS. The most widely publicised example of this is the Raven tools case, but there is no doubt that Google is actively and in some cases aggresively discouraging the vendors of this type of technology. (Raven were very open about the fact that they were given a choice by Google - continue scraping keyphrase position data or continue to receive access to the Adwords API. It opted very publicly for the latter approach). 

All of this adds to the rapid evolution that SEOs are having to go through to keep pace with Google. The algorithm has forced us to update our approaches and techniques, but this issue has also forced us to be smarter in the way we measure the contribution of organic search to a business.  

Google clearly wants to encourage us to look at ROI from SEO through routes other than concentrating on individual keyphrases and all of the above seems to be a contributor to this approach.  

Martin Dinham

Published 28 January, 2013 by Martin Dinham

Martin Dinham is Director at Channel Digital Limited and a contributor to Econsultancy. You can connect on Twitter, LinkedIn or Google Plus

2 more posts from this author

Comments (16)

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Andrew Smith

Andrew Smith, Director at eschermanSmall Business

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Malcolm Gibb

I totally agree with this. Looking at my clients profiles (and my own sites) year on year, not provided terms have risen in volume from around 2 or 3% last year to around over 50% of total organic search volume this year. Not only does this make our lives harder, but it's much harder to gather insight and report on key performance indicators like brand searches year on year.

With Firefox's announcement (and also Chrome by the way!) that search is going secure by default we are only going to see (not provided) term volume get even higher to a point where we will only be able to make assumptions and guesses on what specific keywords are driving traffic.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Nick Stamoulis

"but this does seem somewhat debatable when you consider the fact that this data is readily available for paid Adwords traffic. "

That's exactly how I feel! If Google wants to protect the privacy of their users that is fine, but don't 1/2 protect some users and leave the rest open.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Elan Sherbill

This article neglects to mention another reason Google hid the (not provided) keywords: They want marketers to upgrade from Free to Premium Analytics. The latter is a $150,000 annual subscriptions - hardly chump change, even for Google.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Elena Rover

An optimist's comment: From a content marketing perspective, (notprovided) is liberating. With referral info blocked and keyword data lacking validity, writers no longer are slaves to keywords. Instead, they must write for humans, not for bots. More thoughts: ow.ly/hd3Oh

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Sam Lempriere

The other segment that will be included here is mobile/tablet.

I use android devices and am signed in to Google on both, permanently.

With the spread of android, this will extend much further than the tech savvy audience.

over 3 years ago

Laura Phillips

Laura Phillips, Digital Marketing Executive at Koozai

I have to agree with Malcom, the percentage of 'not provided' for my clients has increased greatly over the last year or so. It's frustrating not having the insight we used to take for granted, and while I see (to a point) why this decision has been taken it all seems a little grey to me.

over 3 years ago

Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton, Editor in Chief at ClickZ Global

@Elan - it's my understanding that Premium Analytics users don't have access to this (not provided) data, otherwise the stated privacy aims would obviously be a bunch if bull. Or am I wrong?

over 3 years ago

Martin Dinham

Martin Dinham, Managing Director at Channel Digital Limited

@Elan, @Graham - users of GA Premium will still be unable to access (not provided) data. GA Premium has much going for it (unsampled data, unlimited custom variables etc), but its still subject to (not provided) limitations.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Jack Jarvis, Owner at The Website Review Company

I believe in the next 18-24 months once Google has killed off other analytics companies (who would pay for only 70% of the overall data?) that G will release 3 versions of analytics.

1. Free (Basic data with major parts hidden)
2. Premium (What was Google analytics before the hidden data) for a fee
3. Enterprise - The current Premium $150,000 version

over 3 years ago

Elan Sherbill

Elan Sherbill, Blogger at Building Keystones

@Graham, @Martin, Not sure why, but I've been walking around with that assumption for over a year now. Thanks for clarifying.

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Shashank G

Must say Google is all set to make things difficult for .Now analytics has been transformed a lot

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Sandeep K

Seems like even Google has grown more serious towards making more business through PPC making SEO difficult and Analytics too.

over 3 years ago

Andy Headington

Andy Headington, CEO at Adido LimitedSmall Business

Thanks for sharing your data & views - this is a BIG problem for all of us which is only going get worse this year. Whilst the article is great we have to say that this post is very similar to an article which we wrote several months ago...

http://blog.adi.do/2012/07/the-not-provided-problem-four-months-on/

Great minds minds eh?

over 3 years ago

Martin Dinham

Martin Dinham, Managing Director at Channel Digital Limited

@Annabel - thanks, great minds indeed... I'd be interested to see an update on the numbers from your 20 websites and see how close the correlation was with our numbers?

over 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Brent Copstead, Sr. SEO Manager at Wheelhouse Search

Sorry, hit the "Post Comment" before I read the No HTML comment.

about 3 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.