Travel aggregator sites dominate airline brands for both natural and paid Google rankings, according to a new report looking at search visibility.

The analysis by Searchmetrics also found that brands achieving high natural search rankings are taking the opportunity to limit their investment in PPC.

The study is based on analysis of how airline brands performed on Google for the 1,439 most popular search terms relating to flights. It examines results for the US, France and Germany, but for this post I’ll focus on the UK results.

And for more information on this topic, check out the Econsultancy Paid Search Marketing Best Practice Guide or our UK Search Engine Marketing Benchmark Report.

SEO visibility

As is the case with a number of other industries, travel aggregator sites are the most visible brands on Google with and topping the list by some distance.

The highest ranking airline brand on the list is easyJet which appears in sixth place, just ahead of Ryanair in seventh position. British Airways is the only other airline to rank among the top 15 most visible travel brands.

The report’s authors suggest that airlines have effectively chosen to outsource their online strategy to travel portals and invest little in boosting their own prominence in Google search results.

Paid search

Interestingly, none of the brands that appear in top five for natural search visibility achieve a similarly high ranking for paid search.

For example, Skyscanner topped the natural search ranking but comes in ninth for PPC. Clearly the brand doesn’t feel it’s necessary to invest heavily in paid search due to its strong SEO performance.

In contrast, British Airways is clearly relying on paid search to boost its search visibility and appears in third place on this list.

Link building

Tripadvisor dominates the competition when it comes to building backlinks, racking up 876,696 links compared to Opodo’s 477,485.

The report states that in the last six months Tripadvisor has reduced its number of harmful links, while disproportionately many more backlinks have been built. and rely on a slightly restrained link strategy, but isolated spikes suggest that since February measures have been taken to reduce harmful links and to build backlinks that strengthen the sites.

And how not to do SEO in the travel industry...

To finish off this post, here’s an example of a travel company (an airport to be precise) implementing dodgy SEO practices. 

Whoever created this dropdown on one of Luton Airport’s pages is potentially guilty of keyword stuffing...

David Moth

Published 4 September, 2013 by David Moth

David Moth is Editor and Head of Social at Econsultancy. You can follow him on Twitter or connect via LinkedIn

1719 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (2)


Matt Lovell, Head of Customer Data, Insight & Analytics at Eurostar International Ltd.

The above article is interesting however it does feel as though Searchmetrics have pulled out an conclusion in "airlines have effectively chosen to outsource their online strategy to travel portals and invest little in boosting their own prominence in Google search results" as a sweeping statement and ignored their additional observations about the restrictions in place on flight carriers versus mass market aggregators.

Ultimately most of the airlines only operate flights to a series of specific destinations so it wouldn't be cost effective or remotely logical for them to actually start optimising their website / bidding on keywords related to other routes. Similarly, for the largest traffic keywords such as the generic cheap flights, flights and last minute flights, it doesn't make financial sense to try to target these for smaller companies who will instead be more focused on specific routes they operate. As a result, this sort of analysis is always going to skew in favour of aggregators or mass market players.

As an additional aside, the other interesting thing in the UK market is that while Travelzoo are top in terms of Paid Search, ultimately, since they direct most of their traffic to the competitors below them (in Skyscanner and Kayak), there are definite questions to be asked about whether they have a suitable model.

Ultimately, if Skyscanner or Kayak can pay for traffic from Travelzoo and make money when they then sell this on to the airlines, it suggests Travelzoo are missing a trick here while once someone has followed this journey once, surely the odds are they will return to Skyscanner next time and cut out one of the middle men!

almost 5 years ago


Michael Bian

Should have some people to maintain it's rank in Google, generating traffic really helps company to make it's business popular and easily searched.

almost 5 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.