{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

We’ve covered second screening a bit on this blog (like this on Twitter's lead over Facebook), but with Zeebox providing an ever more sophisticated product, I don’t think we’ve fully taken stock of the possibilities for advertisers.

Yesterday I attended Mobile Marketing Live and listened to Ernesto Schmitt, CEO and Co-Founder of Zeebox, talking about the future for the product, and TV in general.

In this post I’ll look at what Zeebox looks like now, which broadcasters are supporting it, opportunities for advertisers, and other possible revenue streams for the company.

The question I'll attempt to answer - 'Are the incentives for users as broad as those for advertisers?'

The state of play

  • 91% of adults watch TV at least once a week.
  • 53% of adults multitask with TV and another form of media.
  • 25% of these second screeners are regularly using this activity to communicate about TV shows.
  • 6m Zeebox downloads so far.

Two main considerations for the second screen

Creative

Storytelling will perhaps gradually get reinvented. It’s no longer as linear as it was. Ernesto estimates that in ten years time we won’t recognise television, as interacting with the show is more likely to occur via an app or browser, and not always during a programme’s air time.

Commercial

Theoretically a second screen can do away with most of the funnel, from stimulus to purchase/brand engagement. No longer will advertisers have to leave their consumers in the ether between devices.

TV ads can be interacted with immediately via Zeebox.

Functionality of Zeebox

  • Discovery: helping to surface programming you may be interested in. Also works as a remote control. Many of the features are optimised by the fact that users log in to Zeebox with Facebook or Twitter, so the app starts with a decent profile of your friends and interests.
  • Social: chatting in app, sharing through Facebook and Twitter. Shows have their own ‘rooms’ where typically hundreds of people are discussing particular programming. Of course, this increases for bigger events.
  • Information: further detail on shows and show content.
  • Participation: the interactive parts of the app experience. Games, polls, quizzes etc. This enables a virtuous cycle with results from the app being shown on the TV screen.
  • Shopping: In-app purchases now available, used in-ad. 

Interestingly, the platform uses aural stimuli to detect what programme you’re watching. This is how ads are launched in-app. 

Why the ads are so powerful: user profiles and click-to-buy

Advertiser call-to-actions appear on the second screen. The aural stimuli from the TV ad will start the in-app ad. As social log-in is enabled in Zeebox, the advertisers have the option of serving different ads to different demographics, the most obvious being to split the ads between ages and sexes.

This teaming of app ads with TV increases recall, positive association and interest in a brand.

An analytics platform is built in for advertisers to see what level of click-to-buy or ‘click to find out more’ is observed.

But will enough users sign up?

The advantage of Zeebox (over Twitter) for users is based on extra content. The programming info and show suggestion is powerful, as is, of course, the interactivity. 

But there remains the question, what if people only want to chatter? If I only want to talk about a show, I’m still more likely to do that in Twitter. Yes, there are fan rooms within Zeebox, but these are surely only for the fanatics, not Joe Bloggs.

Zeebox is cleverly trying to increase the reasons to share in Zeebox. Starwatch is a feature that shows you what various celebrities are watching. This is the kind of feature needed to make people want to use the app over something like Twitter, giving it another USP apart from the interactive content that not all users will want, except for the biggest, most interactive shows such as XFactor.

And what about streamers?

If more and more people start streaming and watching again through services like iPlayer and 4OD (I, like a lot of Londoners, have a laptop and a TV license, but no TV), then how will Zeebox capitalise on ads? The ads on the laptop will already be clickable and Zeebox likely won’t always have tie-ins.

It’s also difficult to second screen when you’re already dealing with a laptop that isn’t always as unobtrusive as a TV.

 

Future monetisation through betting?

One possible route for engagement and monetisation is betting. The platform has also been earmarked as a potential betting app, with the ability to place bets on anything from sports, to who is going to be eliminated from the Apprentice.

If Zeebox goes down this route, and there are some suggestions they may trial this first in Australia, it could be a powerful form or revenue generation.

The advantage for broadcasters

No more app graveyard

The app has a CMS so broadcasters can continue to develop ‘apps’ in Zeebox. One of the main advantages here is the reduced cost, standalone apps can cost $500,000 and aren’t used out of season.

Starting from scratch with each programme’s app and having the user download multiple apps for multiple shows is expensive for the broadcaster and a barrier for the user.

With Zeebox, the consumer downloads once and the broadcaster develops multiple apps much quicker.

Broadcasters in partnership

Sky has a 10% stake in Zeebox and is the only UK broadcasting partner. This is a great advantage obviously, as all Sky’s second screen apps are built with Zeebox involved in their technology. 

There is cross-broadcaster support elsewhere with Comcast, NBC, Viacom and HBO in the US, and Network Ten and Foxtel in Australia. This makes integration with programming a lot more compelling. Without partnering, there is the suggestion that in some ways Zeebox is piggybacking on content.

It’s clear that once users are sucked into Zeebox the platform is great for advertisers.

The only question that remains is 'can the creativity added to a TV show become great enough with Zeebox that it fully trumps Twitter?'

Ben Davis

Published 4 October, 2013 by Ben Davis @ Econsultancy

Ben Davis is a senior writer at Econsultancy. He lives in Manchester. You can contact him at ben.davis@econsultancy.com, follow at @herrhuld or connect via LinkedIn.

781 more posts from this author

Comments (2)

Avatar-blank-50x50

steve sampson

Downloaded Zeebox. Never use it. Multi-screening is a massive growth area - which is why Twitter and Facebook will unload their heavy armour and dominate the market. SKY's investment is a hedge against the technology meeting a market. I doubt it.

almost 3 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Sergi K

Steve,

What makes you think people will use Fb/Twi during live broadcasts?

Yes, people do twit during live events, but that's 'echo chamber' -- everyone is shouting and noone is listening. So there's not much value in twitter buzz.

Here you have people gathering around common topic.

over 2 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.