Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.
That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.
Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.
With 'new' disciplines like content marketing emerging all the time, as well as lots mergers and takeovers, the digital agency landscape is complex and ever-changing.
This is shown by the starchart below, put together by Jack Hagley for Neil's Recruitment. It's also a canny piece of content marketing.
You can see the chart below, and it's also worth checking out our Top 100 Digital Agencies report, a guide to the top agencies, with info on income, services and more.
Unlike our Top 100 list, this starchart shows agencies by headcount. The bigger the star, the larger the team.
Here's the chart, though you'll need to click on the image to take it all in....
What does the data represent?
According to Founder Neil Middlemass:
- Orbits show agencies that are part of a group.
- Planets are agencies.
- Stars are agency groups. They show the aggregate size of the constituent planets in the group.
- Inner-orbits are used to show group-level functions.
- Where the group owns business unrelated to media/advertising, we’ve shown it with a UFO next to it to indicate ‘not to scale’.
- There are a few quirks in there: look around for a black hole, a planet surrounded by a meteor cluster and The Death Star (naturally).
The agency type was determined by their websites, as well as the hierarchal status and the date of founding. We took the UK headcount data from LinkedIn, which is the size of the planets. This year we phoned literally every agency on the chart to ratify all of the above information and to better understand the hierarchy/structure of the groups.
The timeline shows the founding date of the overall parent (so WPP in the case of Mediacom for example). It’s more relevant for the newer/start up companies.