{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

70% of display advertising is still bought in the old fashioned manner. Yep, that’s right, faxing order forms, negotiating prices etc. 

But the advertising market is changing with programmatic advertising on the rise, whether it’s real time bidding (RTB) or programmatic direct.

There are new companies springing up all over the place providing technology platforms for buying real-time targeted advertising (so called ‘demand side platforms’) or technology to help publishers automate and optimise the selling of impressions. 

New research from Turn, a digital advertising platform, shows the programmatic market is getting more competitive in some sectors, with CPMs increasing across channels, apart from mobile (where supply is quickly increasing). 

What are the opportunities for marketers in different sectors when using RTB platforms? 

In this post I’ll quickly explain a bit about programmatic advertising, as it can be a bit of a mind-bender for those on the outside, and I’ll take a little look at Turn’s latest research into trends.

First of all, if you’re unclear on what programmatic advertising is, in short it can be summed up in two ways.

Programmatic direct: automation of the process by which a publisher or network sells advertising space to an advertiser.

RTB: the more intriguing side of automation, an advertiser bids across a network of publishers, looking for specific audiences. When any user loads a website, data is sent to the ad exchange about the user (browsing history, demographics etc) and a very quick auction happens, with the successful advertiser getting an impression if the criteria match, often paying the second highest bid price, to keep things a bit fairer.

I’d highly recommend reading the Econsultancy RTB Buyer’s Guide for some background on programmatic, as well as the Econsultancy report, Programmatic Marketing: Beyond RTB 

What are the advantages of programmatic?

In short the advantage is greater accountability, with advertisers more sure of when and where their ads are showing and to whom. The targeting effectively allows advertisers to pay for a specific audience, rather than impressions served with the hope of reaching the right people.

The benefit for the publisher is that web real estate previously undervalued, such as ads below the fold, can be sold more competitively (to the highest bidder) and this helps publishers to sell more of their inventory.

Increase in spend

Magna Global estimates overall programmatic ad spend will reach $33 billion by 2017. This means that most sectors are beginning to be disrupted by programmatic, whether it be financial services or apparel.

More people are buying

Turn Advertising Intelligence Index (TAII) is a measure of competition for advertising space. The index is based on the Herfindahl Index, the global standard methodology for measuring competition.

[TAII is defined as the sum of the squares of the advertiser spend shares of the 50 largest firms (or summed over all the firms if there are fewer than 50) within the industry, where the spend shares are expressed as fractions.]

This index shows that all channels have become more competitive over the year. In ascending order of competition these are display, social, video, and mobile.

But eCPM decreasing in mobile

On the whole, this increase in competition across each channel has lead to an increase in price of programmatic advertising. The one exception however is mobile, where supply is increasing significantly enough for price to come down, despite more advertisers in the market.

increasing cpm in programmatic across social, display and video, but decreasing in mobile

Competition varies by sector

The chart below shows that competition isn’t increasing in all sectors at once. Predictably, travel, financial services and telecoms are three sectors seeing increased competition in programmatic.

These sectors are ones you’d traditional expect to see some level of retargeting as browsers are coaxed through to purchase.

travel, financial services and telecoms are three sectors seeing increased competition in programmatic. autos, real estate and jewelry have seen decreased competition in programmatic.

Global trends

Globally, too, there are differences in competition across markets and channels.

Established programmatic markets (Americas, Europe) are predictably more competitive than emerging markets (Asia, Africa, and the Middle East). And counter to global trends, the mobile market in Europe is more competitive than the video market. 

Seasonal trends

It’s interesting to look at apparel ad spend on Black Friday, where a small number of advertisers (low competition) spend a lot of money on advertising looking to drive footfall into stores.

On Cyber Monday, competition is higher and spend is lower, showing that companies may be able to benefit by going larger with their bid range and perhaps being smart enough to target traffic that may have been browsing in store over Black Friday.

Black Friday sees a small number of programmatic advertisers (low competition) spend a lot of money. Cyber Monday, competition is higher and spend is lower.

It’ll be interesting to see how the programmatic market develops. Check out the Turn research here, and some of our other posts on programmatic.

Ben Davis

Published 28 February, 2014 by Ben Davis @ Econsultancy

Ben Davis is a senior writer at Econsultancy. He lives in Manchester, England. You can contact him at ben.davis@econsultancy.com, follow at @herrhuld or connect via LinkedIn.

808 more posts from this author

Comments (3)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Tom Henshaw

Note to Author:

It's slightly misleading to paint the picture that "old fashioned" non-programmatic equates to "faxing order forms, negotiating prices, etc."

There are many supply-side technology platforms that enable the smooth transacting of ad inventory on a guaranteed (i.e. non-programmatic) basis, including the automation of Insertion Order creation, digital execution and the management of said inventory's rates.

Yes, there are upsides (not to mention the downsides) to trading with greater automation, but let's make sure we're being realistic about the alternative options.

over 2 years ago

Ben Davis

Ben Davis, Senior Writer at EconsultancyStaff

@Tom

Yes, thanks for clarifying, Tom. I admit to still being on a learning curve when it comes to ad buying, so apologies for starting on that slightly misplaced foot.

Thanks for commenting!

over 2 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Roy Pereira

Tom is right.

"Programmatic Direct" or "Automated Guaranteed" is solving the problems with the current "faxed" IOs. These problems are similar but also very different than what the "Programmatic RTB" technology solved for the remnant space.

over 2 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.