In 2007 researchers conducted an experiment where subjects sipped the same wine from two different bottles.

The only variable was the price tag, the wine’s market value. Not only did the subjects say they enjoyed the wine from the more expensive bottle, their neural activity showed heightened pleasure associated with better flavor and taste. 

As Rory Sutherland said: 

How do you get adults to enjoy wine? Why, it’s simple. Pour it from an expensive bottle.

This is essentially the power of brand. Perceived value can potentially affect experience more than the actual quality of the product.

I think our collective obsession with the TV show Mad Men has something to do with this idea.

I know I’m fascinated every time our dark antihero (or Peggy!) takes an object we’re indifferent to and suddenly gives it power over us. It’s fascinating, in part, because it shows that value is alarmingly subjective. Changing perception can radically alter an object’s worth. 

How radically? I’ve collected some extremes, marketing rebrands so powerful that they’ve drastically changed our social history.

They give us insight into the context, psychology, and ingredients of successful rebranding. Since, as marketers, it’s our job to position products just so in the minds of our audience, it makes sense to draw on the genius of marketing past. (Be prepared, though, for some evil genius as well as good.)

1) Let them eat potatoes

In the late 1500s, potatoes began to spread from Spain to the rest of Europe. However, people regarded them with great suspicion and disdain.

Despite the fact that potatoes could better feed his nation and lower the price of bread, Frederick the Great of Prussia found his subjects extremely unwilling to eat them.

Even a royal mandate to grow and eat potatoes was unilaterally ignored. (The town of Kolberg protested: “The things have neither smell nor taste, not even the dogs will eat them.”)

So, Frederick rebranded. He planted a 'royal' field of potatoes and set up a heavy (but not too heavy) guard around them.

Nearby, peasants deduced that anything well-guarded must be of great value and soon enough there was a thriving black market for potatoes. Soon after this brilliant move, potatoes became a Prussian staple.

2) Why you crave bacon for breakfast

Bacon and eggs, is there a more quintessential breakfast? Well, there certainly was. In fact, people didn’t eat bacon at all a century ago in the States.

Bacon and eggs was the brainchild of Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud. (Side note: Bernays was one of the most prolific and impactful marketers in all of history. He literally invented 'public relations.' If you can spare the time, you’ll be happy you watched this documentary on him and other aspects of modern consumerism.) 

In the 1920s, Bernays ran a bacon campaign for the Beech-Nut Packing Company. After finding, through market research, that most Americans ate light breakfasts, he employed his agency’s internal doctor (yes, the standard for objectivity was low) to say that a heavier breakfast was a healthier option for the American public.

This dubious medical advice was deeply ingrained in the American consciousness after a successful press blitz, radically changing the nation’s diet. Here’s a clip of Bernays recalling that immensely successful campaign. 

3) Why cigarettes have that je ne sais quoi

 Although tobacco sales were booming in the 1920s, there was one thorn in the cigarette companies’ side: women.

Sales to women were dismal, since it was taboo and even illegal for women to smoke in certain areas. (As late as 1922, a woman from New York City was arrested for lighting a cigarette on the street.) So, who was big tobacco going to call? That’s right, Edward Bernays. 

Women had just won the right to vote, and Bernays used that to his advantage. He employed several debutantes and fashionable society women to smoke during a women’s rights parade.

They were instructed to tell the press that they were not smoking cigarettes, they were smoking 'torches of freedom.'

The cigarettes became symbols of their equal standing with men. Suddenly infused with the allure of emancipation, cigarette sales to women began to soar.

4) A Veil on modernity

Around the time of WWI, Atatürk Mustafa Kemal Atatürk rose to power in Turkey. He admired the democracy of Europe as progressive.

One of his desired reforms was to get Turkish women to stop wearing the hijab (veil) and enter the workforce. Rather than ban the veils outright, however, Atatürk took a sneakier tactic: he ordered that wearing them was compulsory…for courtesans, that is. 

Since women didn’t want to be associated with the profession, they quickly stopped wearing the veil.

Atatürk dramatically reduced the use of the veil in Turkish society by making them unfashionable, instigating massive cultural change without revolt.

5) How wristwatches became manly

There was a time when a man wouldn’t be caught dead wearing a wristwatch (anytime pre-1900s, that is). Wristwatches were a woman’s accessory. “I would sooner wear a skirt as wear a wristwatch,” one man allegedly quipped.

So how did we get to their modern status as a symbol of power and masculinity?

Although men wouldn’t wear them in pre-1900’s society, soldiers did wear them in wartime. Pocket watches were too cumbersome to carry into battle, so men wore wristwatches as it became more and more important to synchronize battle plans to the second in the 19th century.

The trick for watchmakers was to apply that prestige to everyday life. This was accomplished, at least in part, through testimonials. In 1901, this “unsolicited testimonial” was run by a watch and clock company: 

… I wore it continually in South Africa on my wrist for 3 ½ months. It kept most excellent time, and never failed me.—Faithfully yours, Capt. North Staffs. Regt.

As war heroes endorsed watches, they quickly lost their effeminate connotation. Now, of course, men’s watches are a billion dollar industry.

Society has changed, but has marketing?

You could make a compelling argument that what happened in the instances above could never happen with today’s savvy, and often cynical, consumer. It might be a good thing for society if that’s the case, since marketers have changed the world for evil as well as good. 

I don’t think, however, that the landscape is all that different. When it comes to marketing, it is still the case that brilliant lateral thinking gets results. And, as these TEDTalk speakers can attest, people haven’t changed that much either. (Rory Sutherland’s talk sparked several of the ideas in this post.)

As someone at a company that just changed up their brand, I spend a lot of time thinking…what makes this work? What causes change and makes it stick? Sometimes it’s as much important to look back as forwards.

Charity Stebbins

Published 11 June, 2014 by Charity Stebbins

Charity Stebbins is a content strategist at Conductor and a contributor to Econsultancy. Follow her on TwitterGoogle+, or connect with her on LinkedIn.

9 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (7)

Save or Cancel

Dennis Miltner

Fantastic anecdotes, here, Charity - thanks for your curation.

While I have been a fan of Bernhay's work years, I had no idea why I still said that a big breakfast was: "The Most Important Meal Of the Day."

i only accepted it, because I was taught it - and where did my parents get it from? - and now I evangelize on that subject. Even though I feel myself immune from advertising!

about 4 years ago

Charity Stebbins

Charity Stebbins, Content Strategist at Conductor

Thanks Dennis! It never ceases to amaze... how the origins of many of our beliefs & habits come from marketing.

about 4 years ago



Great article. Very impressed with the ingenuity of these examples!

about 4 years ago

Sarah Alder

Sarah Alder, Managing Director at ICAEW

Thanks Charity. I am not sure if I am impressed with the ingenuity like Didi or slightly horrified at the naked manipulation they demonstrate. Why do I care? Because I like to think that the marketing I do is authentic, it promotes genuine benefits, but probably all of us, under the guise of "presenting it to its best effect" are being quite manipulative. Oh dear, I really don't have time for soul searching today, maybe I shouldn't have read this post. :(

about 4 years ago

Charity Stebbins

Charity Stebbins, Content Strategist at Conductor

But if not now, when, Sarah? Just kidding, just kidding. I'm pretty sure that's what our vacation time is allocated for (soul-searching). Anyway, I agree that there's an uncomfortably dark side to marketing, both historical and present. And of course there are social benefits we can effect, too.

There's no panacea for that very real professional tension that I know of...but being conscious of the of marketing is at least a start. I'd really recommend listening to the TEDTalks I linked to if you have time, they're a very interesting follow up!

about 4 years ago

Sarah Alder

Sarah Alder, Managing Director at ICAEW

Haha! Yes, Charity, when my unethical marketing earns me enough I will go on hols and have a good old rummage round my soul. Until then, it's the TedTalks, thanks for the prompt.

about 4 years ago


Dave Mutton

Fascinating article, but nothing has changed. you only have to look how Beats headphones gained traction with their campaigns, first at the UK Olympics and then this years Superbowl - they received lots of coverage with athletes "wearing the brand"

about 4 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.