Content is very important for SEO, but this should also come with caveats, as simply creating more and more isn't always the answer. 

Following on from yesterday's post on sub-domain conflicts, here I'll look at a few examples where brands' content-led pages are harming their search rankings.

Content and sub-domain conflicts

Brands will often house their news and other content on sub-domains. This is not necessarily a bad idea, but it needs to be implemented with the overall search strategy in mind. 

For example, Barclays has an Ask Barclays section which is heavy on content, answering various customer questions. 

This is no bad idea in itself, and clearly has its uses for the site's visitors, but it is also harming Barclays' search rankings, as this page often ranks more highly than other pages on the site. 

The chart below shows this conflict between 'Ask Barclays' and the main homepage for the term 'switch banks', a valuable one to own on Google. 

The homepage was ranking on the top two pages of Google between January and May this year, after this the Ask Barclays pages are forcing it out of the SERPs for much of the time. 

(Click image for larger version)

 

In another example, from Morrisons, we can see that its content-led sub domain Your Morrisons isn't necessarily helping here. 

For such a broad term, I think Morrisons would prefer to show visitors its homepage, and it has solved this part of the problem at least, since traffic to your.morrisons.com redirects to morrisons.com. 

However, this doesn't necessarily solve the SEO issue, and we can see that this sub-domain conflict is affecting the homepage's rankings for the term. 

(Click image for larger version)

EE

If you were EE, which page would you want to rank for 'apple iphone'? The main shop page or the help section? 

The shop page seems to have been battling with its help pages for search rankings over the last eight months, though it does rally just in time for the new iPhone launch. 

 

However, as I write this post, EE is down on page three of Google for the term, with all of its rivals ranking higher. So it has to spend money on PPC for visibility: 

Monarch

It's a similar story for budget airline Monarch, with its blog content seemingly affecting search rankings. 

Looking at the chart, there's a lot going on here. The main site did edge into page one for the term 'sharm el-sheikh city breaks' for a while but has ended up on page six of Google. This is nowhere for all but the most determined searcher. 

In conclusion...

In all of these examples, the decision to create more content was seemingly taken without considering the effects it may have on search rankings. 

This has led to sites creating sub-domains which cannibalise the search rankings of other pages which are more likely to convert visitors. 

This doesn't mean that sites shouldn't create more content. As Editor of a blog which creates value for the business, I can see that there are more pros than cons, if done well. 

However, simply creating more content without fitting it into an overall strategy will not produce the intended benefits.

Google is only going to index one page per search term from any site, so it's important to decide which page you'd like to rank, and provide clear signals to Google to this effect. 

We do this by using internal links and having hub or dedicated pages for the terms we target and using internal links to send this message to Google. 

For example, if we rank for 'content marketing guide' we want to send searchers to a relevant report on the topic, or perthaps to a page showing available training courses.

Other times, if we have no report or training which matches, we'll try to ensure that the most useful blog post ranks for the term. The key is to have a coordinated strategy so that different teams and departments are not competing for the same search rankings. 

Graham Charlton

Published 30 September, 2014 by Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton is the former Editor-in-Chief at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or connect via Linkedin or Google+

2565 more posts from this author

Comments (4)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Andrew Cock-Starkey, Product Marketing Manager at Cambridge English Language Assessment

Graham, a few times recently you've said things like "Google is only going to index one page per search term from any site..." but I'm not sure that's strictly true, is it?

I don't mean to be pedantic, I'm just trying to find out if this was a 'Google rule' I've missed, or you're making a general term (that's mostly true) to reinforce a point?

over 2 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Jarren Kumaran, Marketing Specialist at 3M New ZealandEnterprise

...is this an issue for Google to sort out rather than SEO's trying to manipulate a frequently changing system to get the relevant results that users actually want?

OR is it Google enforcing PAID ADVERTISING as the way to ensure users get results that they actually want?

over 2 years ago

Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton, Editor in Chief at ClickZ Global

@Andrew Yes, it's mostly true but there are exceptions. I think sites need to look at it that way though and decide which page they want to push hardest.

over 2 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Kevin

Yes, SEO content making is about strategy and the success of your campaign depends on how you properly utilize which are most effective. And add this. It's true that having a lot of contents will help you on your keyword competition, but they should not made on purpose of inserting keywords alone. Prior to that, they should serve as a valuable resource where readers could obtain answers to their questions and address certain problems.

over 2 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.