We receive a lot of press releases and pitches from PRs on the content team. And, I'll be honest, 90% are ignored or deleted. 

There is simply too much noise and the shame is that the sheer volume means that some useful approaches may be overlooked. 

In this post, I want to explain what we look for and provide a few tips for PRs approaching us... 

Why do we blog? 

Our audience is the digital marketing community (if I can call it that), which encompasses a range of roles, areas of expertise and levels of knowledge. 

Econsultancy's brand is built on helping marketers understand and make use of the web, thereby making their jobs easier. For this, we have a range of great reports, training, events, and the blog. 

Another important factor for Econsultancy is to take seemingly complex issues and present them in plain English. 

The blog is about getting the brand known and providing articles which digital marketers will find useful, which will create informed debate and perhaps inspire people to investigate the site further and check out our splendid reports, events and training. 

In that sense, we have been content marketing ever since the blog was launched more than six years ago, even if we haven't always called it that. 

The quality of the content is the prime consideration. While we do sell ads on the blog, this is not necessarily the primary source of revenue for us. Hey, we use a bit of linkbait now and then, and we know the value of lists online, but it's not all about the pageview numbers. 

What do we cover here?

Broadly speaking, we cover any aspect of digital marketing and ecommerce which our readers will find useful.

The topics we cover most are ecommerce, search, social media, content marketing and mobile, but we also look to provide insight on web analytics, online advertising, and many other things digital. 

Within these topic areas we are looking for: 

  • Data (industry insights for our verticals). We like data on UX tests, interesting studies into search, anything which offers new insights for our readers. 
  • Tools. If you have something we can use to add value to our posts, let us know. 
  • News on ecommerce/ website launches. We review ecommerce sites regularly, so keep us up to date with new launches, redesigns, etc. 
  • New and innovative marketing campaigns. We like to know about new campaign which offer lessons for other marketers. Even better if you come to us with stats. 
  • Mobile commerce and apps. Are you launching a new mobile site or app? Let us know. 
  • Client-side interviews. While we don't rule out interviews with suppliers / agencies, we'd often rather speak to brands and retailers. 
  • Startups. We run regular Start Me Up! Q&As, so let us know if you have an interesting startup. 

What do we not cover here?

  • We don't cover news about new hires. It's good to know sometimes for us, less interesting for our readers. 
  • We don't cover rebrands.
  • We don't write about client wins, though if you have some useful stats or case studies further down the line, then we might be interested. 
  • We don't cover funding or acquisitions. If it's funding, you may be a candidate for a startup Q&A. 
  • We don't do news per se, though we may do an analysis piece or review based on a piece of news, like this on the Apple Watch

Tips for PRs approaching us

Though I'm thinking about Econsultancy and the press releases we receive, these tips will apply to many sites. 

Understand the site before you make an approach

If you come to us with news or irrelevant content, it'll just be ignored. Worse, it'll be marked as spam. 

I get too many emails which have nothing whatsoever to do with any topic we cover.

Presumably someone somewhere is just plonking my name onto a list and broadcasting willy-nilly. 

On the other hand, if you have clearly read the blog, and have something you think will be useful, or relates to something we've written recently, your email has a much better chance. 

Have we already covered the topic? 

We published a bunch of trends / predictions posts in January, such as these 'mega trends' from our CEO Ashley

After a week or so, and certainly by February, we decided we'd published enough, but I still received plenty of pitches for 2015 predictions. 

Personalise emails

If you address them in in such a way that we can tell they're tailored to us, then we're more likely to respond. 

We'd like to think that you have thought about how relevant your approach is to us, rather than just sending the same thing to dozens of marketing sites. 

Send me the report

If you’re sending out a press release to promote a new piece of research then make sure to attach the report or include a link to it.

It’s extremely frustrating and a waste of time having to go back to a PR to request a copy of the report. Even worse if I have to register to download it.

The same applies to charts and images - if you have them, send them through.

Journalists and bloggers are generally up against the clock so we don’t want to waste time by going back and forth for content that you’ve hinted at in your press release.

Get our names right

A small point perhaps, but if you can't even get our names right, it tells us immediately that you haven't even considered whether your approach is relevant. 

I've been called all kinds, including 'Editor Charlton' and 'Graham at Tech Crunch' lately. 

Think before phoning

I know you want to give your press release as much of a chance as possible, but it's also important to realise that journalists don't always have time to respond. 

If it's ignored, it's reasonable to take it as a sign that we're not interested, so no need to phone. 

Don't capitalise

This is just annoying. I guess it's supposed to make your email stand out, but it just suggest you haven't a clue. 

Nothing says “I’m spam, send me to the recycle bin” quite like a shouty, capped up headline. And the same goes for exclamation marks!!!!

Get to the point

It's a great help if you can get to the point in the first paragraph.

If your first two paragraphs go on about how your client is a ‘leading marketing solutions provider’ your reader will quickly lose interest.

Generally your client isn’t the story, the research they’ve commissioned is, so lead with juicy stats rather than the client’s biography.

Keep it brief

Even if your report is groundbreaking stuff, I don’t want to read a massive email listing every single detail.

Try to limit the email to four paragraphs, maybe five at a push, and use bullet points to make the interesting stats easier to read.

Provide the detail further down if needed. 

Build relationships

There's a lot to be said for building a relationship with bloggers and journalists and personalising emails. 

If I recognise the name of the sender and have had some contact with them outside of simply being included on a press release list then I’m far more likely to open their emails.

There are a number of PRs whose emails I'll open and read automatically as I know they understand what it is we do. 

Send donuts;)

Let's be clear, we can't be bribed. Econsultancy is part of a PLC and gifts can’t cost more than £50.

Still, even if we don't cover your press release, donuts will leave a warm feeling ;)

Graham Charlton

Published 12 March, 2015 by Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton is the former Editor-in-Chief at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or connect via Linkedin or Google+

2565 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (3)

Pete Austin

Pete Austin, CINO at Fresh Relevance

Re: "Send me the report".

This is *exactly* how I feel when I read some article based on a report, but the report itself is unavailable or registration-walled, so I can't do a quick check of the methodology..

almost 3 years ago

Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton, Editor in Chief at ClickZ Global

Hi Pete, I sympathise, though we can't just give away our report content. In the case of PRs, they're hoping we'll cover the report, so it's just common sense to send it. And something we do when we approach other publications for coverage.

Btw, if you ever need to check the methodology, the free reports previews contain this information.

almost 3 years ago

Pete Austin

Pete Austin, CINO at Fresh Relevance

@Graham, thanks. I get that. It's an issue of different business models, and not uncommon in marketing.

Not your fault, and it's far from unique to marketing - I'm only commenting here because it's the field I work in, not e.g. climate science which is arguably worse and certainly more important. My concern is for the science, because the common business model of gating reports means that e.g. bloggers, who have a major role in rebroadcasting them, are strongly incentivized to do so based on the (free) headlines/summary rather than the (paid) whole thing. Mistakes and weaknesses are seen by less eyes - and usually only the eyes of insiders - so they risk going unaddressed. Here are a few big causes of errors:
http://www.triggeredmessaging.com/blog/6-things-every-marketer-should-know-about-statistics

almost 3 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.