Clorox is the latest brand to face a social media firestorm after it posted an image on Twitter of a Clorox bottle made up of emojis with the caption "New emojis are alright but where's the bleach."

Despite the fact that there were no face emojis in the graphic, some Twitter users jumped on the brand, calling the company out for being racist.

Last Wednesday a number of racially diverse emojis were added to iOS, so some users appeared to take the timing of the Clorox tweet to mean that Clorox was suggesting these new emojis be bleached white.

Maskeroni called the incident "one of Twitter's more bleachable moments" for good reason: even if it was a dud of a message, it's clear that the intent of the Clorox tweet was not malicious or racist.

Even so, Clorox eventually attempted to bleach the incident away by deleting the offending tweet and apologizing.

Of course, many people recognized that Clorox wasn't suggesting the unsuggestable, but on social media, small fires can look like big fires, and sometimes small fires can even become big fires. Which raises a question for brands like Clorox...

Why bother?

In a strategic context, one could argue that the Clorox tweet was ill-advised not because there was a wrong interpretation of it under which it could be seen as being racist, but rather because it doesn't really say anything of importance.

As one commenter, Matt Maher, a Social Media Manager at ad agency Initiative, sarcastically joked, "If you're like me, when you think of quality storytelling and can't-miss content, you think of CLOROX."

Jokes aside, content for content's sake is one of the biggest problems in social media marketing today, and the Clorox backlash demonstrates why it's so important for brands to think strategically about what they post.

Obviously, a brand that sells cleaning products is probably going to have more of a difficult time producing compelling content than a brand that sells cars. This doesn't mean that Clorox and companies like it shouldn't participate in social media, but it does change the risk-reward proposition significantly and that should be top-of-mind for those responsible for making decisions about how social channels are used.

For more on content marketing from the blog, check out The importance of quality content and these 15 indispensable content marketing tips.

Patricio Robles

Published 13 April, 2015 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2545 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (1)

David Kyle

David Kyle, Head of E-Commerce at Park Cameras

I have to agree wholly with this one, it is very odd companies jumping on the 'latest news' bandwagon.

Yesterday I saw Irn Bru and Marmite advertise Game of Thrones related content - all it looks like is brands jumping on a topic and hoping to go viral.

At least do it when the content is slightly relevant to the brand!

over 2 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.