What comes first: the distribution or the content?

I’ve been turning this question over practically in the last year through running my own publishing startup, but the answer remains strangely elusive: if you invest in content, the answer to that content doing well seems to be in its distribution to the largest audience possible.

If you invest in forming distribution networks, you need good content to make those networks effective.

This is a catch 22 situation. You need both, but not every company will want to invest in both simultaneously. So how can we best tackle this problem?

Viral video distribution

Video virals give us a useful starting point. The success of a viral is almost always inferred on the content, as something we can see, rather than the network which we can only see as a quantified mass of viewing figures.

Without powerful analysis tools (Google+ ripples a basic example) we can’t see which influencers really made the difference between the video going viral or not.

So it’s often claimed that the content is the crucial element (e.g ‘Content is King’) – but this isn’t particularly helpful for marketers. 

The distribution lottery

Even if you are certain of the quality of your content, expecting it to go ‘viral’ or be distributed by the masses is like entering the lottery and expecting a jackpot.

Amongst the ocean of cute baby videos, we have to say the reasons for success of something like Charlie Bit My Finger are largely blind luck.

One of the most successful virals of all time: Charlie Bit My Finger.

People record a particularly shareable moment with no plan of distribution, which subsequently gets shared like wildfire. Given 300 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute, you can see that the likelihood of going viral is clouded by the sheer volume of competition.

Meanwhile, we can only expect a tiny proportion of this content to meet the right criteria and wider context to go viral.

The content creator has only a small hunch that this content could go viral. The rest of the process is down to many unplanned variables coming together at the right moment. For marketers, lotteries cannot be relied on.

We can take risks, but we need to calculate them better than a fire and hope for the best. Content alone then cannot be relied on.

Content and distribution are married

I was once watching a video of Gary Vaynerchuck promoting his book, Crush It! he said some words that stuck: ‘Content is King, but marketing is Queen, and she runs the household.’

Image: CMS Panda

I also came across this quote from the New York Times report on digital innovation:

At The New York Times, far too often for writers and editors the story is done when you hit publish,’ said Paul Berry, who helped found The Huffington Post. ‘At Huffington Post, the article begins its life when you hit publish.

Again, we might consider that the content comes first in both of these cases. After all, at the Huffington Post, it is made clear that the editor published content, then distributed.

But Vaynerchuck’s quote suggests that the two are wedded,  you cannot have one without the other. Successful content distribution does not come through pushing it out as an afterthought.

There should be a pre-existing network of relationships that can distribute the content, or the distribution needs to be built into the content.

The viral trend of media

One of the most fascinating trends in digital publishing in recent years is the explosion of viral publishers, which have been able to make colossal audience gains for seemingly small investments in a matter of months.

BuzzFeed took a while to get going, but it tipped around 2012 and became one of the largest content sites in the world.

Upworthy reached 80m monthly unique users in 18 months, Lad Bible gained an audience of 40m unique users and a Facebook reach of over 10m likes (significantly more than BuzzFeed’s and Upworthy’s main accounts).

Facebook sharing and the infamous newsfeed algorithm are really the key distribution factors in their success. These sites essentially look for populist content that matches their brand positioning, and remix that to be shared with a large audience.

That in itself is a sound formula, but if they had no audience in the first place, how could they make such rapid gains?

The answer is in first investing in enough social connections, often through paid acquisition (short term) and regular updating (long term).

Once this audience has grown sufficiently large, they then find shareable content to feed the audiences – this has a snowballing effect: share shareable content to large audiences, and you will be shared more.

The LAD Bible: Big on Facebook

Earning media through third party content

Many brands have acquired similar large reaches on earned media over time, but there are many more businesses who do not have that luxury. What is most striking about the above examples is that you actually need to create very little content yourself to become really big.

You can curate from elsewhere, and the only content effort you make is in the selection of content and how it is framed in small social headlines descriptions.

Thus the content strategy is framed around selection rather than creation, and the selection itself framed around how shareable that content is to the audience.

This shareability then builds the social distribution platforms. In this scenario content creation actually takes no part – so we could argue that it is a distribution first approach.

Content with no pre-made distribution network

Unless you have substantial finances, creating a large social following takes a long time to achieve, although there is nothing to stop you starting this long term project today.

But what if you are already in the motions of building large content pieces that you want to be shared and have no distribution network?

Again, the content cannot be disconnected from the distribution. You could include the views of influencers within your content – with a vested interest in the piece, they are likely to share it with people who follow them in turn.

Alternatively, you could use a SEO/content distribution agency agency or a paid for network. But like attempting to outsource your content marketing production, I would only say these can be short term solutions compared to building your own relationships.

Conclusion: content marketers should spend 50% of their resources on distribution

Content can exist without distribution, but there would be no point to that content unless it was for personal use only.

What we see throughout this post is that successful content does not exist without distribution, and distribution cannot exist without content. That said, building distribution networks can exist without creating any content of your own.

For marketing purposes, the two are simply forged together, like in Gary Vaynerchuck’s metaphor of marriage.

So the answer to my opening question is that neither actually comes first, but that we must always attempt to form a content strategy where content and distribution are tied together and invested in equally.

James Carson

Published 25 May, 2015 by James Carson

James Carson is a media and content strategy consultant and a contributor to Econsultancy. You can follow him on Twitter and connect on LinkedIn.

27 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (6)

Save or Cancel

Harekrishna Patel, eCommerce Marketing Consultant at XtremeUX

Hello James,

Really informative post. I completely agree with that, It's required to distribute or promote your content once it's published. According to me, Social Networking websites play a good role to promote content. Promoted posts increase chances for engagement and sharing.

over 3 years ago


Luke Lovell, Creative Director at REM

Hi James,

Many thanks for sending this around. It has long been a challenge for us to convince clients that distribution is key to the success of their content. This will help. After all (and please excuse the analogy), if you play a really catchy tune beautifully on the violin... but you only ever play it in the bathroom, who's going to hear it?

over 3 years ago


Mark Schaefer, Executive Director at Schaefer Marketing Solutions

This is one of the themes of my new Book The Content Code. "Content is not the finish line, it is the starting line. Distribution, however, is just one means of igniting content. We need to deeply understand who is sharing content, why they are sharing it and where to master this new art of content transmission.

about 3 years ago


Diana Combs, Content Writer at Varied

This was great, thanks. It validates the approach I've taken for my freelance work. I love how much content and content writing/marketing is discussed so much these days!

about 3 years ago


Mani Gandham, CEO at Instinctive

Definitely agree. However I would argue that paid options are one of the better choices, especially for reach and execution, not to mention all the analytics and ROI capabilities that modern platforms provide.

We just have to realize that not all brands and not all content will be completely able to take advantage of organic social sharing and inbound attention. As the article says, why create all the content if nobody reads it?

Disclaimer: I'm the founder of Instinctive - a content syndication platform that powers distribution and brand awareness for the Fortune 500. https://instinctive.io for more info.

about 3 years ago


Zo Zhou, Marketing specialist at Traction Digital

Fantastic post and some great quotes that beautifully simplify your point. One other part of distribution that is often overlooked is using your most loved "evergreen" content for onboarding new subscribers, and improving the targeting of content. With everyone hopping on the content bandwagon, how can you cut through and be smart about maximising the content you've already created?

about 3 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.