In 2009, 'sex educator' Violet Blue launched a URL shortener designed for all of those NSFW links you might want to share. The service, billed as the "first and only sex-positive URL shortener", was located at

Most of us don't think about the .ly portion of the URL when we, for instance, see a link. But as learned the hard way, it's pretty important.

The .ly country code top-level domain (ccTLD) belongs to Libya, and while plenty of companies, including, have used their .ly domains without problem, announced yesterday that its registration of was revoked because it ran afoul of Libyan Islamic Sharia Law.

Libyan Spider Network, which is involved in the operation of the .ly ccTLD, apparently tried to contact's owners through a reseller that handled the domain registration, requesting removal from an image that it found offensive. But it wasn't just an image of a woman showing her arms that did in. Alaeddin S. ElSharif of Libyan Spider Network explained:

...our request related to you through our reseller was quite simple: the removal of any and all offensive imagery on the site and of the statement boasting that its ‘the only adult friendly URL shortener on the internet’, an honor our Registry has no interest in obtaining nor wants under its banner.

While one might debate whether or not went too far, it really is a moot point. As ElSarif correctly noted, "the issue of offensive imagery is quite subjective, as what I may deem as offensive you might not." As they say, when in Rome, do as the Romans do. So when your domain's ccTLD is in Libya, you should expect to do as the Libyans do. Don't like the rules? There are plenty of other ccTLDs to choose from.

But on the subject of Libya and .ly, one might ask what this situation means for services like and Probably not much. It would be premature to conclude that, and other URL shorteners using the .ly TLD are at risk of being shut down by the Libyan government. But's quick demise on the basis that it was violating Libyan Islamic Sharia Law highlights the risks involved with using ccTLDs. It's unlikely, for instance, that and others have retained counsel familiar with Libyan Islamic Sharia Law, even though one of their business' most important assets is basically subject to Libyan Islamic Sharia Law.

It's equally quite unlikely that publishers give much thought to the ccTLD's of their URL shorteners. But perhaps they should. It's not too hard to imagine a service like being asked to remove a particular shortlink that runs afoul of local law. And if faced with the threat of losing its domain, you can be almost certain that would comply with the request.

Fortunately, the shutdown is an isolated incident, but it does provide another reason for publishers to reconsider URL shorteners, or at the very least choose their URL shorteners more wisely.

Photo credit: rahuldlucca via Flickr.

Patricio Robles

Published 7 October, 2010 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2642 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (0)

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.