{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Linkbait may be good for online publishers' traffic levels, but what does it do for their bottom lines? According to research conducted by Perfect Market, not much.

The company, which aims to help online publishers, including newspapers, better monetize their properties, analyzed more than 15m articles across 21 newspaper websites this summer to determine which types of articles bring home the bacon.

At the top of the list: financial issues, like unemployment and mortgage rates, and important news events like an egg recall. At the bottom of the list: linkbait subjects such as celebrity gossip.

While Perfect Market states that its data "runs counter to a lot of the conventional wisdom in the industry," I'm not sure that anyone expects "articles about Lindsay Lohan’s repeat trips to rehabilitation and Brett Favre’s purported sexual peccadilloes" to directly produce loads of ad revenue. As Perfect Markets' Robertson Barrett points out, "There are not a lot of contextual ads on Lindsay Lohan stories." That, of course, is probably a good thing.

Certainly, linkbait content can in some cases outperform less sordid content revenue-wise in absolute terms even if CTRs and eCPMs are much, much lower. After all, an article with a $2.50 CPM that receives a million pageviews will generate more revenue than an article with a $5 CPM that receives 100,000 pageviews.

But the relative underperformance of linkbait traffic isn't really the issue I believe Perfect Market makes it out to be. The purpose of linkbait content should never be to directly generate revenue; it should be to directly generate links. Hence the term linkbait, not revenuebait.

Those links, of course, can have a beneficial SEO impact which helps an entire site. That linkbait content often servers as doorway content. In other words, the person who clicks through to a newspaper website to read a story about Lindsay Lohan might very well go on to read a story about, say, unemployment.

The big question for publishers is not whether linkbait can be a valuable tool, but rather how much of it should be produced. This, of course, will vary from publisher to publisher, property to property. And this is where analytics come in. Publishers have all the ability in the world to track how search and referral traffic generated by linkbait interacts with content that delivers higher advertising value. Publishers who want to succeed would be wise to look at this.

Photo credit: wka via Flickr.

Patricio Robles

Published 19 October, 2010 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2381 more posts from this author

Comments (1)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Gary

I've commented before about link bait and although i do think it works i also think its very hard to pull off, The best link bait is quick whitted and funny, If its not bait about current news or events then it can also work but the idea has to be unique.

i think the best link bait i have seen recently was 'what your email says about you'

almost 6 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.