Last year, Google helped form the Coalition For Better Ads, an organization intended to develop new global standards for online ads that improve user experience. 

This March, based on research derived from surveys of 25,000 consumers, which sought to identify the least preferred ad types, the Coalition published an initial draft of Better Ads Standards for desktop and mobile. 

Among the ad experiences that the Better Ads Standards determined "fall beneath a threshold of consumer acceptability" are pop-ups, auto-playing video ads with sound, large sticky ads and full-screen scrollover ads.

Of course, publishing a list of bad ad types and getting advertisers and publishers to stop using them are two very different things, and that's where Google comes in. In April, the Wall Street Journal reported that the search giant was planning to add an ad-blocking feature to Chrome, a significant move given that Google, which generates tens of billions of dollars a year in revenue from digital ads, has more than a few incentives not to add an ad blocker to its browser. 

In June, while announcing a new monetization offering that works in conjunction with its Google Contributor offering, Sridhar Ramaswamy, Google's SVP of Ads & Commerce, confirmed the report: "we plan to have Chrome stop showing ads (including those owned or served by Google) on websites that are not compliant with the Better Ads Standards starting in early 2018."

Ramaswamy also announced the Ad Experience Report, a tool that "helps publishers understand how the Better Ads Standards apply to their own websites" by providing screenshots and videos of bad ad experiences that Google has identified on their sites.

Google's initial findings

Now, with 2018 fast approaching, Google is starting to identify sites with problems. According to Scott Spencer, Google's Director of Product Management for Sustainable Ads, "In just two months, 140,000 publishers worldwide have viewed the [Ad Experience Report]."

What is Google finding? On desktop, pop-up ads are responsible for 97% of the Better Ads Standards violations. On mobile, pop-ups are still a problem, accounting for over half of violations, but high ad density is responsible for just over a fifth of violations. 

Spencer says "Our early reporting shows that most issues are not coming from mainstream publishers, like daily newspapers or business publications. They come from smaller sites, who often don’t have the same access to quality control resources as larger publishers."

But there are a few notable exceptions, including Forbes and the Los Angeles Times. Both received "failing" status from the Ad Experience Report. Other high-profile sites that received warnings include CBS News, Kiplinger, Lifehacker, and UK Independent.

While Google is still working through its plans for enforcement once Chrome's ad blocker has launched, as Digiday's Lucia Moses notes, "One aspect of the plan that may raise alarms with publishers is that Google hasn’t ruled out filtering all of a failing site’s ads — not just the offending ads." That, for obvious reasons, does not sit well with publishers.

For that reason, publishers who haven't already done so would be wise to see if their websites have been reviewed by the Ad Experience Report, although it's worth noting that of the approximately 100,000 sites Google has reviewed so far, less than 1% (700) are said to need corrective action.

Patricio Robles

Published 11 August, 2017 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2647 more posts from this author

You might be interested in

Comments (2)

Pete Austin

Pete Austin, Founder and Author at Fresh Relevance

I approve of stopping annoying adverts, but if Google looks like it's the one making the decisions, using a dominant browser like Chrome, then this will be very controversial and they are taking a big regulatory risk. There's already concern that Google may sometimes be discriminating on political grounds when it selectively blocks monitization in YouTube.

about 1 year ago

Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles, Tech Reporter at Econsultancy


Yes, this is one of the reasons many are concerned about Google's decision to incorporate an ad blocker into Chrome. Once the implementation details are known, I would not be surprised to see this become another flash point in the discussion and debate about whether Google needs to be more tightly regulated.

about 1 year ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Digital Pulse newsletter. You will receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.