Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.
That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.
Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.
I read with interest that Ryanair was the subject of a recent EU decision, thanks to its failure to provide an email address as a customer contact option.
While it's important that companies selling online should provide customer service by email, retailers should make sure that customers can easily find an email address, and that responses are within a reasonable time.
Unfortunately, this doesn't always happen, and many online retailers have plenty of room for improvement in their email customer service.
Why is email customer service important?
If customers need to contact a company urgently, then they are most likely to pick up the phone and dial, but this can mean a world of pain when attempting to contact some companies.
I've frequently experienced waits of ten minutes or more when contacting online retailers, which is pretty much unacceptable.
This makes the alternative email contact option more appealing, as I can fire off a question and save time wasted in call queues. If managed properly, it can also take the pressure off call centres, and allows companies to take time to investigate issues and provide information without keeping a customer waiting on the line.
A recent survey found that, though 41% will make a complaint by phone, 61% will use email. Significantly, 20% turn to social media to voice their frustration, which should provide an incentive for firms to improve the quality of their email and phone customer service.
Ryanair's contact options
Ryanair provides a lesson in how not to do it, and the airline seems to make it as hard as possible for customers to contact them.
Customers have the choice of two phone numbers, one which charges 10p per minute, the other a priority service at £1 /min (rival EasyJet also charges for phone calls, though it does have a contact form). If customers don't want to pay to contact customer services, the only other options are fax (who really uses fax these days?) and by post.
Ryanair has justified this by saying that it responds to '99% of letters and correspondence within 7 days of receiving it' and that 'if we do implement an email address then it will probably just slow down the whole process'.
The EU regulations on email complaints
The Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002, implement the EU's E-commerce Directive into UK law. The relevant part of the legislation, as explained by out-law.com, is this:
The email address of the service provider must be given. It is not sufficient to include a 'contact us' form without also providing an email address.
This is clear enough, though the fact that a contact form doesn't fulfil the requirements of the legislation is interesting, as a number of retailers, such as Next, provide a form rather than an email address. Perhaps the EU will be after them next...
The dreaded contact form
A form can be useful for channelling customer complaints to the correct department, but they are often a source of frustration as users are seemingly made to jump through hoops to make contact.
I don't want to single out Next, as there are plenty of other retailers that offer the contact form option only (or I can't find their customer service email addresses). This includes Play.com and eBay, which can be a nightmare, thanks to all the various drop-down options you need to select.
Personally, I hate the things, as they often seem to be a method of avoiding customer contact, and delaying the actual moment that you send your query.
For example, if you select 'contact us' on eBay, you have to define the nature of your query before you can even get near the contact form. You could then have several more steps before you can explain your issue:
While I can see that firms would rather customers check out the FAQs before they contact them, making them work too hard to make contact is just annoying.
There is a balance to be struck, and River Island's contact page is a pretty good example of this:
Clicking 'contact us' takes you straight to this page, where users are shown some of the most common FAQs on the left of the page. Then, all of the other contact options are there for customers, email, phone and post.
There is a contact form, but River Island also provides the email address if people prefer not to use the form.
Speed of response
The next problem that customers face, once they have filled in the contact form or found the email address, is getting a response from retailers.
Email often seems to be the poor relation when it comes to customer services, one of the common problems being the speed of response, or lack of response in some cases.
I've experienced this myself on a few occasions. For example, I'm still waiting for a response to a complaint emailed to Toys R Us in November. I bear grudges in such cases, so I avoided Toys R Us when Christmas shopping. If customers get zero response, or a poor one, then many are likely to feel the same way.
It's a common theme of reports on online retail and customer experience:
- Snow Valley's recent Delivery Report found that more than 60% of email enquiries about deliveries took more than one day to answer.
- The same report found that 16% didn't respond at all, which is shocking.
- 5.7% didn't provide an email address at all. Someone tell the EU!
- 39 of the 50 UK retailers benchmarked in a recent eDigital study scored 50% or less in the speed of email response category.
It may be that there are good reasons why email customer service can be poor, lack of resources, or the need better technology for example, but this is of little interest to customers; they simply want an accurate and timely response when they email companies.
Customers need a response, and one within a reasonable length of time. Not responding to emails, or making them wait too long is a great way to lose customers.