{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Recruiting great employees can be a significant undertaking, and in some industries, such as technology, many companies are finding it downright difficult.

But according to a survey conducted by Dice.com, there may be a way to find talent, and pass less for it: offer telecommuting.

The online job search provider polled nearly 950 tech professionals and found that just over a third of them would accept a 10% pay cut if given the opportunity to work full-time from home. According to Dice.com, that equates to an average $7,800 decrease in salary.

Beyond the niceties afforded by telecommuting positions, there's a good reason tech workers are willing to sacrifice for them: full-time jobs that allow telecommuting are hard to come by. On Dice.com, "Less than 1% or 500 of the total jobs posted...mention telecommuting as an option." In other words, demand far exceeds supply.

For companies looking to attract top talent, and pay less for it, the message seems clear: offer telecommuting positions.

But is that really a good idea? On paper, telecommuting offers both employers and employees some potential benefits, both in reality, these arrangements can be difficult to work with. For instance, they can complicate project management and make it harder to build a cohesive corporate culture.

Of course, telecommuting doesn't make project management impossible, and establishing a corporate culture doesn't require that every employee be present on-site every single day.

But for telecommuting to work, companies need to be strategic. That means asking the right questions before offering such opportunities. Three of the most important are:

Are we ready to support telecommuting?

Working with remote employees comes with its own set of requirements and challenges. Companies with no telecommuting experience should be prepared to meet them.

From network infrastructure to project management personnel and tools, there's a lot to cover and it's best to have everything covered before you create telecommuting positions.

How could on-site employees be impacted?

Telecommuting invariably has an impact on the employees who don't work from home. Will they have a harder time getting their jobs done if they have to deal with employees working remotely?

And is it possible that some of them will resent not having the option to telecommute themselves? Creating work from home opportunities without thinking through these sorts of things can demoralize the employees you have on-site, and in the worst cases, drive them away.

Will we really save money?

If the Dice.com survey is to be believed, companies could cut costs through telecommuting. Not only are many workers apparently willing to take a pay cut in exchange for the ability to work from home, telecommuting opens up the possibility of hiring workers in locations with lower wages.

But telecommuting can be more expensive if it reduces overall productivity, or your company is ill-equipped to ensure that employees are performing work when and how it's expected.

Patricio Robles

Published 26 April, 2011 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2429 more posts from this author

Comments (4)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Casie Gillette

Cisco recently just put out a report regarding their telecommuting week and the results were amazing. Almost 35,000 people telecommuted for a week and cost savings were something like $2.7 million dollars while time savings were around 2 hours per person.

While it's not for everyone, we've definitely gotten a ton of feedback from people wishing their companies would embrace it.

over 5 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Leslie Schneider

On the verge of starting a coworking company on Bainbridge Island, my partner and I are banking on creating demand for a third option between the corporate office and working from home. We believe that membership in a shared workplace community, full time or part time, can be a productive benefit for both employer and employee alike. Thoughts?

over 5 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

aullman

Remote offices make sense for most workers. ROCs (Remote Office Centers) make it possible for workers to work outside their home, but from a location that is convenient and economical. Employers have to pay for workspace for employees anyway, but there is no reason that the workspace has to be in some centrally located office downtown.

over 5 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

P. Juarez

I understand how the economy can affect a person's outlook on the job market. But the best thing to remember is: There is always a way around everything in this old world and someone willing to step up to the plate and give a solution to the problem. According to job market telecommuting experts, in 2012 the percentage of companies and corporations that have increased their telecommuting job offers will be 35% and another 41% have already done so. That is good news for people who can't leave home to work or need to stay home with their children but still need additional income to survive.

over 4 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.