{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

"Don't feed the trolls." Anybody who has ever participated on a message board or blog knows this is usually good advice.

When it comes to patent trolls, however, some of the world's largest companies can't find enough food. When faced with demands from companies that do little more than buy and license patents, tech stalwarts prefer feeding to fighting.

And for good reason: patent litigation is expensive, and a lost lawsuit can be even more expensive.

But Apple is learning the hard way that feeding the trolls isn't a painless path. Recently, independent developers with iPhone and iPad apps making use of Apple's in-app purchasing capabilities were contacted by Lodsys, a patent troll, alleging that their use of in-app purchases constitutes infringement of a patent it owns.

Not surprisingly, Lodsys, whose patent bears the lovely name "methods and systems for gathering information from units of a commodity across a network", was more than willing to resolve the matter with the targeted developers, for a fee.

Yesterday, Apple responded: developers building for its platform aren't guilty of infringement because...Apple has already licensed the Lodsys patent and that covers its developers. In a letter to Lodsys, Apple states:

The technology that is targeted in your notice letters is technology that Apple is expressly licensed under the Lodsys patents to offer to Apple’s App Makers...These licensed products and services enable Apple’s App Makers to communicate with end users through the use of Apple’s own licensed hardware, software, APIs, memory, servers, and interfaces, including Apple’s App Store. Because Apple is licensed under Lodsys’ patents to offer such technology to its App Makers, the App Makers are entitled to use this technology free from any infringement claims by Lodsys.

Will Lodsys back off now? Time will tell. But even if it does, the drama highlights the tangled web that has been weaved between the world's top technology companies and the patent holding companies that exist solely to extract money from them.

Under normal circumstances, Apple developers would never know that there might be a patent covering in-app purchasing functionality licensed from a patent troll. But thanks to Lodsys' aggressive behavior, we have a glimpse of the dirty dancing that goes on around patents.

What's interesting here is that so many seem resigned to participate in the dancing. When Lodsys' letters first emerged, Marco Arment of Tumblr and Instapaper fame suggested that developers were better off feeding the patent troll than fighting it.

Patrick Igoe, an intellectual property attorney, took issue with that stance. He noted that Lodsys' claims against independent developers may not be valid, but more importantly, he observed:

A Lodsys-like business model seems to depend heavily on developers holding beliefs like Arment's. Making money by collecting small amounts from large numbers of developers requires a low transaction cost for each collection. Developers who roll over based on these beliefs keep transaction costs low.

...If no one stands up and says "we're not infringing" in this round...what do you think Lodsys will do once it collects its first round of checks? Those who settle in early rounds will likely be funding the actions against other developers.

He's right, of course, and given the number of patents that have been issues that could conceivably cover all sorts of functionality, developers likely wouldn't just be dealing with Lodsys. You can be sure that patent trolls, like wild animals, will quickly flock to the nearest source of easy food.

So what's the solution? Without reform that restores the patent to its intended purpose, there is no way small and mid-sized businesses can fight the Lodsys' of the world. So it starts with companies like Apple. If they feed instead of fight, you can be sure that this won't be the last time patent trolls come to developers seeking every last crumb.

Patricio Robles

Published 24 May, 2011 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2405 more posts from this author

Comments (4)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Alec

This is why software patents are bad for the industry in general.

Who hold the patent on a cookie, by the way?

over 5 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

david smith

The word is "woven", not "weaved"

over 5 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

David T

How exactly are Apple "feeding" the troll when they have stood up to it, telling developers NOT to pay? Not a particularly well thought out story.

over 5 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Rob

David T - hence why the article states that Apple is now "fighting" the troll it previously "fed" by licensing the patent originally.

over 5 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.