{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Recently, Razorfish's Paul Gelb suggested that the spend on mobile ads could soon surpass the spend on television ads, even though television advertising currently has a hundred-billion-dollar-plus lead.

There is, of course, good reason to believe that mobile advertising's best days are ahead. Mobile penetration is significant, and smart phone penetration is growing rapidly.

But there are challenges. As I previously noted, "Mobile ads, on the other hand, may have some theoretical advantages, but it's clear that advertisers aren't yet ready to throw tens of billions of dollars at them annually. The inventory (not the medium) simply isn't that attractive right now."

A new study conducted by Relevancy Group on behalf of Pontiflex sheds some light on the value of the inventory. In surveying advertisers, it found that a sizable 43% won't increase their mobile spend in 2011 because the ROI simply isn't there. If it was, 93% would feel comfortable increasing their spend.

Where's the ROI? According to the study, mobile advertising is failing advertisers because "advertisers have not been respectful of consumer behavior." Click-based ads stand out, but they produce errant clicks. That upsets users, and also drives up the cost of advertising.

The solution: "with the high incidence of accidental clicks, marketers cannot continue to use traditional online ad units and measurement models." To this end, Pontiflex is marketing "signup ads" which employ the pay-per-signup, not pay-per-click, model.

Will CPA prove to be the model that works on mobile? That remains to be seen. The big problem all mobile ad units will face is balancing usability and user experience without watering down ads so much that they're totally ineffective. On this note, advertisers will need to better understand the mobile channel. Yes, the mobile is a powerful device through which massive audiences can be reached. But advertisers should keep in mind that the mobile is also a very personal device, making the potential to annoy far, far greater.

Patricio Robles

Published 3 August, 2011 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2394 more posts from this author

Comments (1)

Avatar-blank-50x50

Nick Stamoulis

"mobile is also a very personal device, making the potential to annoy far, far greater."

Excellent point! The opportunity to connect with people wherever they are is given to us with mobile technology, but we have to tread lightly. You can't treat a mobile phone like a computer or a TV. It is a unique device with unique characteristics and people have certain expectations.

about 5 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.