{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.


That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.


Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Google's Android operating system has proven to be a big hit, and that's good news for Google.

But it has also been good news for companies like Microsoft, which are profiting and seeking to profit from patents that Android may be infringing.

Now British Telecom has joined the Android patent litigation and licensing circus.

Last week, the telecom giant filed a lawsuit in the United States alleging that Android infringes six patents it owns. The patents, BT believes, cover various Google products which are integrated into Android, including the Android Market, Google Music, Google Maps, Google Search and Google Places, amongst others.

Florian Mueller at FOSS Patents explains that what BT is looking for is damages.

BT seeks damages - even triple damages for willful and deliberate infringement - as well as an injunction. The complaint suggests that Google refused to pay. The second sentence of paragraph 21 states that "BT brings this action to recover the just compensation it is owed and to prevent Google from continuing to benefit from BT's ivnentions without authorisation".

Do BT's claims have merit? That's not yet clear, but needless to say, a patent lawsuit filed by a formidable opponent is the last thing Google needs.

It raises the question - will Google ever be able to put Android-related patent litigation to bed?

Without substantive patent reform, it appears the answer may be 'no'. If that proves to be true, Google may increasingly find itself contemplating the possibility that Android is both a hotcake and a hot potato.

Patricio Robles

Published 19 December, 2011 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2419 more posts from this author

Comments (2)



Looking through those patents, they seem absurdly vague and many of them are the only simple way to provide a piece of functionality.

Given this and all the rest of the patent trolling that's been happening over the last year, isn't it about time we revisited how patents are granted/enforced? Seen from outside, the entire system seems ludicrous.

almost 5 years ago



Couldn't agree more with Dave's comment. I realise the outcomes of these patent wars can mean millions in revenue, but its stupid and petty and all of the claims made are tiny little pieces of code that provide simple functionality. It's ridiculous. If these companies put more of their legal budget towards R&D for future products and technologies, maybe these silly patents would be obsolete!?

almost 5 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.