{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

As the world's leading search engine, it may not have problems getting consumers to turn to google.com when they need to find something online, but in an effort to promote its non-search offerings to the masses, Google has been increasingly turning to advertising mediums it once shunned, such as television, magazines and newspapers.

The tab in 2011: over $200m.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the search giant's spend on advertising last year jumped to $213m from a measly $56m in 2010. That still might not seem like a lot compared to advertising powerhouses which spend billions touting their wares, but the rapid increase has industry observers taking note.

For Google's part, there's nothing out of the ordinary about its ad spend. "Our focus is on uncovering and telling stories about our products, our users and the magic they both create. The discussion about how to reach people across different media is a much later conversation," a spokesman told the Wall Street Journal.

But the company's newfound love for television and print advertising does represent a change in the company's strategy. Former employees tell the Wall Street Journal that Google once made it a point not to use traditional advertising mediums. Which sort of made sense given that the company's cash cow, AdWords, has arguably played the biggest role in shifting ad budgets from these traditional advertising mediums online.

When it comes to drumming up interest in new services, however, Google is learning that there isn't a one-ad-model-fits-all solution. If you look where Google is spending its ad cash, $70m of the $213m it spent last year went to television, and when it comes to specific products, it shelled out some $12m to promote Google+. Worth noting: Google spent more last year trying to push Google+ than it spent on television ads in all of 2011 ($6m).

The good news for Google is that as it spends more on advertising, it seems to be getting a lot better at creating good ads. At the end of the day, however, Google's advertising goals are clear and the success of its products will be the ultimate measure by which the success of its ad campaigns are judged.

Patricio Robles

Published 27 March, 2012 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2392 more posts from this author

Comments (2)

Andrew Lloyd Gordon

Andrew Lloyd Gordon, Digital Marketing Expert, Speaker and Trainer at New Terrain Limited

Ahh, the irony of it all...

Isn't it time we dropped the artificial and less-than-useful division between 'traditional' and 'digital' marketing?

As this post shows, let's not care what's it's called, when it comes to marketing, let's just do what works.

over 4 years ago

Avatar-blank-50x50

Dipesh

Isn't it bit obvious that like any other company, when time comes they need to find new ways to expand the market share. Online users do not need introduction to google. Guess its time for offline.

over 4 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.