{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.


That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.


Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

Levels of VC investment in 'Web 2.0' companies doubled last year, according to figures released by Ernst & Young and Dow Jones VentureOne at this week's Web Ventures Conference in California.

The firms say $844m (£431m) was invested in Web 2.0 startups in 2006, compared to $406m (£206m) in 2005.

The figures refer to worldwide investment, but $682.7m (£346m) of the total was invested in just 126 US deals.

More facts and figures:

  • The US dominates the Web 2.0 space, with 126 of the 167 Web 2.0 deals involving US firms, 83% more than 2005.
  • 20 deals involved European firms in 2006, compared with four in 2005. 
  • $100.5m (£51m) was invested in European Web 2.0 firms, 200% more than in 2005.
  • Seven of the deals involved French firms, with a total of $39.3m (£20m)invested in 2006.
  • Five of the deals involved UK companies, with a total of $23.4m (£11.9m) invested by VCs. 
  • China had 21 Web 2.0 deals - the same number as 2005, with total investment dropping by 26%.
  • The most prolific investors in Web 2.0 worldwide were Benchmark Capital, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Sequoia Capital, and Omidyar Network.

Ernst and Young reported last December that levels of VC investment were hitting dotcom bubble levels, though Ernst and Young believe that VCs are being more selective than before 2001.

Paul Fisher has also written an excellent round-up of European VC investment in Web 2.0 companies in 2006 on his blog, The Coffee Shops of Mayfair.

Interestingly, his figures do not match Ernst and Young's - he lists 54 deals involving European Web 2.0 firms, while Ernst and Young mentions only 20.


Graham Charlton

Published 22 March, 2007 by Graham Charlton

Graham Charlton is the former Editor-in-Chief at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or connect via Linkedin or Google+

2565 more posts from this author

Comments (1)


Paul Fisher

When I published this research I deliberately wanted to be as transparent as possible: all too often groups like Ernst and Young try to piggy back off a trend like "web2.0" without knowing a jot or caring a fig about it. I'd love to see them actually list their 20 companies and hear their rationale for why include them. NB. The deals on my blog are consumer and internet deals, first rounds in Europe, not strictly web2.0, so maybe Ernst and Young have a get of jail card here....

over 9 years ago

Save or Cancel

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.