{{ searchResult.published_at | date:'d MMMM yyyy' }}

Loading ...
Loading ...

Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.

No_results

That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching “”.
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.

Logo_distressed

Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.

As Google and Oracle duke it out in court over claims that the search giant violated copyrights and patents now owned by Oracle in developing Android, it appears that the battle may have wide-ranging ramifications.

Yesterday, a jury decided that Google violated Oracle copyrights related to the organization and structure of Oracle's Java APIs, but was unable to decide whether Google had a valid fair use claim.

According to Oracle, Google effectively copied 37 Java APIs into its Android operating system, and this represented copyright infringement. The jury, which agreed, was instructed by the judge in the case, William Alsup, to deliberate with the understanding that the structure, organization and sequence of the APIs was copyrightable in the first place.

He may yet decide as a matter of law that this is not the case, but if he doesn't, the future of the API may be a lot more bleak.

As Wired's Robert McMillan details, disputes similar in nature to those being litigated in Oracle v. Google could abound due to the fact that APIs are often imitated, if not duplicated. He points to the cloud, where high-profile projects like OpenStack seek to "mimics" Amazon's AWS APIs. If APIs can be copyrighted, OpenStack and similar initiatives could find themselves in dangerous territory legally.

Particularly disconcerting is the fact that a European court ruled that APIs are not subject to copyright. If courts in the United States, however, take a different approach (for reasons sensible or not), it will likely create a complicated, confusing environment for the countless companies that have created and/or use APIs that are crucial in everything from operating systems to popular internet services.

What's more, as McMillan points out, is that copyright lasts a long time -- 95 years -- as opposed to 20 years for patents. So if you think that the patent wars are bad, the copyright wars over APIs could be even worse.

The question now is whether a single court in the United States will open up Pandora's Box, and if it does, how many companies are, as Oracle apparently is, willing to embrace what's inside.

Patricio Robles

Published 8 May, 2012 by Patricio Robles

Patricio Robles is a tech reporter at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter.

2401 more posts from this author

Comments (1)

Eric Layland

Eric Layland, President at Canna Ventures

Fluidity of data is a foundation of future innovation. Hopefully the courts come down on the right side of the issue. A less likely scenario is that the mega tech corporations find ways to collaborate rather than opt for suing each other.

over 4 years ago

Comment
No-profile-pic
Save or Cancel
Daily_pulse_signup_wide

Enjoying this article?

Get more just like this, delivered to your inbox.

Keep up to date with the latest analysis, inspiration and learning from the Econsultancy blog with our free Daily Pulse newsletter. Each weekday, you ll receive a hand-picked digest of the latest and greatest articles, as well as snippets of new market data, best practice guides and trends research.