A key part in creating a social media strategy is
to ensure that you have a coherent set of measures that align with that
strategy. But how do you prioritise the multitude of measures that are
available to you?  

Which is more valuable – a Facebook “like” or
a twitter follower? This article seeks to set out why and how you can go about
defining this for your own brands.

Much has been written and debated about setting appropriate key
performance indicators for social media, and rightly so. More than ever,
as spend is rapidly being diverted into supporting a business or brand’s social
engagement, it is essential that appropriate metrics are agreed in advance to
ensure that this social investment delivers the necessary returns.  

We have co-authored the IAB
approach to measuring social media
, that
sets out to ensure your objectives for social media engagement are aligned with
your broader business objectives.

The complexity, of course, comes when you begin to get into exactly how you will be
engaging in social spaces. As you get into the detailed planning, you will
appreciate more and more that social is not a channel at all, but more an
approach to communications that can permeate all your traditional communications

Setting aside this greater puzzle for the moment, of how to begin to
incorporate a coherent social strategy into your broader communications
channels, let’s just focus on how to go about setting appropriate measures and
targets for what can be explicitly termed social channels.  

Here, I am
referring principally to engagement spaces covering social connections such as
Facebook and Linkedin, blogging and microblogging spaces such as Twitter,
location based interaction such as Foursquare and Scvngr and subject-based
discussion forums like Mumsnet and Pistonheads.

As you explore each area, it is feasible to begin to set metrics and
targets for each of these areas in turn.  

For example:

Social connections 

goal for the brand is likely to involve building a network of fans and
then engaging them with interesting content and conversation over time, so
some fairly simple metrics here seem appropriate, such as number of
connections and engagement rate. 

This should ensure that you have a
balanced approach to acquiring connections and then building them into
advocates.  In more advanced cases, you may even be able to ascribe a
monetary value to a Facebook “like”, as we have been able to do
for Unilever’s Lynx brand, and this can be used to directly drive the
social media business case.

Microblogging and blogging

What can start off as a social tool to increase the reach of corporate PR
will quickly evolve into a conversation channel. Simple metrics will
involve the number of followers/subscribers, level of engagement and

Reach can be calculated using tools such as www.tweetreach.com, or authority tools, such as Klout or Peerindex.

Location based engagement

Driven by mobile, location based engagement will potentially lead to interaction with brands
in the physical world, and should not be restricted to being considered
simply as an opportunity for retail brand discussion forums. 

Engaging in conversations with audiences
who are interested in the product area is potentially a winning strategy,
while forcing yourself into conversations where the brand is at best
tangential is unlikely to deliver short or long term value.

    Setting a coherent set of metrics and targets is
    hard enough, but a critical step in setting the social strategy and then
    appropriate measures to assess how well it’s being realised is to understand
    the relative value of each of those targets.  

    Which is worth more – a
    Facebook “like” or a Twitter follower? A comment on your own blog, or
    your comment on another’s blog?

    Most of these are incredibly difficult to
    allocate a specific value to unless backed up by some serious research.

    However, giving some significant thought to what each type of interaction
    means is going to be critical if you are going to create a social strategy that
    will genuinely add value to the business.  

    For the sake of starting an
    argument, I will set out my own league table of the potential value of
    different types of social engagement, based on a theoretical FMCG brand, with
    an existing “operational” level of social media engagement, from
    most to least valuable:

    1. Link to Brand blog from
      other blog or site.
    2. Facebook  brand page “Like”.
    3. Twitter follow.
    4. Facebook comment posted on
      Brand page.
    5. Facebook brand comment
    6. Twitter brand comment
      retweeted .
    7. Youtube subscription.
    8. Foursquare or location
      “check in”.
    9. Youtube channel view.
    10. Comment posted on brand blog.

    Starting your own list of the relative value of each type of social
    interaction will certainly lead to a really valuable and important conversation
    as you will have to validate your findings against your own social strategy and
    success metrics.  

    Over time, we will progress towards ascribing an
    absolute value to each of the interactions set out above, but in the meantime,
    it is a great way of evaluating how well your social strategy is aligned to
    your social efforts.