Enter a search term such as “mobile analytics” or browse our content using the filters above.
That’s not only a poor Scrabble score but we also couldn’t find any results matching
Check your spelling or try broadening your search.
Sorry about this, there is a problem with our search at the moment.
Please try again later.
It’s quite common for luxury brands to apply their strong branding values of exclusivity and differentiation to the online space. However, these values are often applied at the expense of usability and SEO.
This article will show examples of how this desire to be different can prove to be detrimental in the online space and discuss why these luxury brands must acknowledge this if they are to embrace the online marketing channels properly.
The site brandchannel.com gives an in-depth insight into what makes a luxury brand; so it’s important we try to retain these core values whilst improving their website experience.
Common Issues for Luxury Brand Websites
First of all, it’s of utmost importance that a brand reflects the terminology that their target market uses, in order to describe their products or services.
The example below is from a boutique hotel site. They refer to booking a room as ‘sleeps’, a more descriptive term would have been ‘rooms’ or even ‘boutique rooms’.
That terminology would be more helpful for a user and it would open up the SEO potential of that page for terms like ‘boutique hotel rooms location’.
Other such examples can be found in luxury fashion there is an insistence on the term ‘ready to wear’ as a collective term for their ‘luxury clothing’ ranges. These fashion houses have historically used this phrase ‘ready to wear’ (born out of the French phrase prêt-à-porter) in order to distinguish that it’s off the peg and not a tailored garment.
In the physical setting at bricks and mortar boutiques, this difference in garment fit clearly needs to be distinguished, however the same cannot be said for the online space.
It would be fair to say that users accept that due to the physical implications of the online setting, the expectation from a user is in fact ready to wear clothing and not tailor made clothing, with neither largely specified within search queries.
This terminology issue is common across all luxury niches as a well-known luxury electronics firm calls their TV section ‘Picture’ instead of ‘luxury TVs’ or even more luxury qualified terminology such as ‘home cinema systems’.
Text as images
Using images to display text is common practice for luxury brands. Understandably for luxury brands, aesthetics and customer perception is everything. Back in a time when web technologies were more primitive, you can understand why these brands preferred to use images for their navigation and buttons.
These days however, web technologies have progressed a long way so that using images instead of text should not even be considered.
Using CSS to change how html text is displayed is more than capable of meeting the aesthetic needs that luxury brands demand. Using images hinders SEO and is detrimental to users (especially those with disabilities) because of two reasons:
Readable html content
Google can’t read the text, therefore has less content and context to understand what subject pages are about. Users that depend on text to speech browsers or that have browsers that don’t display images will be neglected.
Page load time
More hi-res images loaded means that the page load time will increase. A lengthy load time of a page will negatively impact the user experience, potentially causing a bounce.
For this reason, search engines use this as a measure of good user experience, therefore slow page speeds could limit a page (or sites) ranking potential.
Splash & Flash
These are often used to promote the latest lines and brand image or to channel users into sections of a website (for example, content for a specific country).
In the case of promotion or imagery, some would argue that this is a key part of the luxury brand experience. That may well be the case, however it should be at the users’ discretion whether or not they see the splash screen or view the video.
A user visits a site to find some information or perform an action. That action may be to absorb the luxury brand experience (in the form of a video or an intro) but that is just one of a number of things that a user may require from their visit. One of which could be to view a range of items with the intention of buying it, or it could even be to directly buy a specific item.
It is not best practice for any site to dictate to a user what they do on a site. If a user decides that they haven’t found the information they want or its difficult to find that information easily then they will exit the site.
Flash is a fantastic technology when used in the right way to supplement the aesthetics and richness of content of a site that is primarily built on html. Google is getting better at reading flash content and it’s by no means an SEO’s worst nightmare anymore.
The problem therein lies whenFflash is used as the technology to build an entire website or significant portions of a website.
A flash based navigation or intro screen can take time to load and is dependent on having the required browser plugin and bandwidth capable of displaying rich hi-definition imagery.
Luxury brands do tend to be partial to a touch of flash, as this is down to the aesthetic richness that can be produced using flash.
As mentioned previously, search engines like Google are getting better at reading flash, but it can prove more difficult to read than traditional html.
To improve SEO you must make it as easy as possible for a search engine to read and index your content. If a search engine uses more resource to index your site then it will index less of it. Making it as easy as possible for search engines to understand and index your content is the easiest route to good rankings. In all too many cases it is this over-use of flash that can be a luxury brands downfall in terms of SEO and usability.
Upon entering the Chanel site it appears that its split into a number of mini sites surrounding their product categories. They have yet to adopt an ecommerce capability. Entering the fashion mini-site (which is entirely in flash) it soon becomes apparent that you need quite a fast internet connection, after a one click of the flash navigation the browser plugin keels over.
Just to show how difficult it is for browsers / crawlers to decipher pages built entirely using flash, here is a snippet showing that Google’s Chrome browser actually thinks the page is in Ukrainian.
Why is all this a problem?
This is an issue for two main reasons:
Findability is the key. In bricks and mortar retail terms, it’s no good having an impeccable store with marble floors and chandeliers if your store has no shop front and is situated in a Peckham side street (no disrespect to Peckham). In short, if no one can find your store, what’s the point in having one?
Navigation and usability is the other key point here. Think of this as your shop assistant, they make it easier for your customers to find what they want. If the shop is cluttered or clothes are hidden then it’s difficult for a user to find what they want and they will leave the shop. The same applies in the online space.
The end result is that some luxury brands won’t have visibility in front of their target market within non-brand specific search for terms like ‘designer handbags’. An even worse outcome of this is that users aren’t able to purchase or easily find items when they specify the exact brand in their search query.
For example, the snippet below shows that for a branded query like ’yves saint laurent sunglasses’ in google.co.uk, the YSL listings are for the USA and neither one mentions the term sunglasses. The snippet shows that much more useful and relevant results matching the search query appear in the sponsored listings for resellers.
The result of all this is that the reduced findability and usability is causing search users to either turn to a luxury brand that is more prominent online or buy that particular luxury brands item via a reseller.
Investment of resource to address these two points is advantageous because they are intrinsically linked with one another. If you design and build your site with the end user in mind, then this is also beneficial for SEO.
It is understandable why luxury brands use these contrasting techniques as a differentiator, and that can work very well in the offline space. However the online world is one where the user experience is key, a more logical approach is needed. Giving users clearly defined options and not forcing them into a particular action.
It seems like all too often as the rest of the web accelerates in terms of ease of use and usability, luxury brands are being left behind. They are constrained by the successful offline marketing principles that are shoehorned into the digital space. Functionality and usability is often an afterthought at the mercy of the all-important branding.
It would be ignorant to dismiss those principles that have defined luxury brands as luxury but in the digital space, it needs to be the other way around; a sound focus on normal best practice digital techniques with luxury branding overlaid.
Users need to be presented with a clear set of options, and information needs to be displayed quickly and in an easily digestible manner. This can be done whilst maintaining luxury perception as sites like Alexander McQueen, Harrods and Matches fashion show.